On 12 September 2016 at 10:34, Sergio Martins wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 21:43:46 WEST Jérémie Delaitre wrote:
>> Can the same checks be implemented in clang-tidy instead of having yet
>> another tool? clang-tidy now has boost specific checks so maybe they would
>> also accept a Qt spec
There is a flag that tells clang to keep going when it can't find something or
encounters too many errors, but it is in clang 3.9.
martin
From: Development on
behalf of Sergio Martins
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 12:34:53 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Hi all,
It seems most of change files for Qt 5.6.2 is still missing from packages :(
Here are the links for open changes:
qt3d:https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170367/
qtandroidextras: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170387/3
qtbase: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170370/
qtca
On Sunday, 11 September 2016 21:43:46 WEST Jérémie Delaitre wrote:
> Can the same checks be implemented in clang-tidy instead of having yet
> another tool? clang-tidy now has boost specific checks so maybe they would
> also accept a Qt specific module in there.
I haven't been able to use clang-tid
Can the same checks be implemented in clang-tidy instead of having yet
another tool? clang-tidy now has boost specific checks so maybe they would
also accept a Qt specific module in there.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 at 03:29 Sergio Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've been developing a Qt oriented clang com
