Hi Andre,
We can try to use libudev (or to parse the sysfs entries) to find out
additional information too.
At first, we just need to check what we can take from it.
BR,
Denis
11.08.2016 16:28, André Hartmann пишет:
Hi all,
[Re-sent as I think something went wrong the first time,
the mail d
Interesting enough that Qt itself switched the OSS license to v3 ...
> Am 11.08.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
>
> On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:50:35 PDT Alexander Nassian wrote:
>>> And they're LGPLv2. The v3 clauses cause lots of companies to run away.
>>
>> Really? v3 jus
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 22:31:13 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
> Am 11.08.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> > On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:58:48 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
> >> Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
> >> promising, at leas
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:58:48 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
promising, at least for an important part of my problem.
Nice to know.
Note the patch is crude at thi
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:58:48 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
> Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
> promising, at least for an important part of my problem.
Nice to know.
Note the patch is crude at this point. It's at the earliest a Qt 5.9 feature.
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:50:35 PDT Alexander Nassian wrote:
> > And they're LGPLv2. The v3 clauses cause lots of companies to run away.
>
> Really? v3 just clarifies some of the implications of v2 in a more suitable
> way for lawyers. Many people that run away don't know how to get
Hi,
oops, looks like I triggerd an avalanche.
Just to clarify, if we can solve the problem within Qt, then there is no
need to include external libraries.
Thiagos patch https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/167772/ looks quit
promising, at least for an important part of my problem.
Best re
Am 11.08.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
>
>> On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:12:26 PDT Alexander Nassian wrote:
>> Why should that not be possible? With Chromium we already have L-GPLv2 and
>> many other. Qt itself is also available as v3.
>
> WebKit (including JSC) was an excep
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 19:12:26 PDT Alexander Nassian wrote:
> Why should that not be possible? With Chromium we already have L-GPLv2 and
> many other. Qt itself is also available as v3.
WebKit (including JSC) was an exception and Chromium inherited that exception.
It's one that di
Why should that not be possible? With Chromium we already have L-GPLv2 and many
other. Qt itself is also available as v3.
Beste Grüße / Best regards,
Alexander Nassian
> Am 11.08.2016 um 18:21 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
>
>> On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 15:28:47 PDT André Hartmann wrote
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 16:18:22 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> > How hard would it be to teach QNetworkInterface how to detect
> > CAN-iness in the interfaces it's clearly able to enumerate ?
>
> I'm currently trying to find this out. What I know so far, is that
> you
On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 15:28:47 PDT André Hartmann wrote:
> In this thread, Kurt Van Dijck proposed his network interface
> enumeration library [2], licensed under LGPL V3
That would be a first if we allowed this. It's unlikely that we'll allow
importing of an LGPLv3-licenced libr
Hi Edward,
> How hard would it be to teach QNetworkInterface how to detect
> CAN-iness in the interfaces it's clearly able to enumerate ?
I'm currently trying to find this out. What I know so far, is that
you can compare "something" to
#define ARPHRD_CAN 280
to find out the interface is o
André Hartmann
> [Re-sent as I think something went wrong the first time,
> the mail did not appear in the archive.]
I haven't seen it before, at least.
> In this thread, Kurt Van Dijck proposed his network interface
> enumeration library [2], licensed under LGPL V3, which perfectly allows
> to q
Hi all,
[Re-sent as I think something went wrong the first time,
the mail did not appear in the archive.]
I'm working on a new feature for QCanBus to enumerate all available CAN
interfaces and query more information about them [0].
As it turns out, the Linux SocketCAN API allows a lot, but ex
We are pleased to announce the release of the Qt VS Tools (Beta)!
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/08/11/from-visual-studio-add-in-to-qt-vs-tools-beta/
Br,
--
Alessandro Portale
Senior Manager, R&D
The Qt Company GmbH
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin
alessandro.port...@qt.io
http://qt.io
Geschäft
Yes, I have one. I'll find a link & sent it to Lorn.
br,
Jani
From: Lars Knoll
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 10:46 AM
To: Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org
Cc: Jani Heikkinen
Subject: Re: [Development] out of date license headers in non supported mo
On 07/26/2016 05:12 PM, Andrea Bernabei wrote:
> I'd like to propose changing the default value of QML Flickable's
> flickableDirection in Qt 5.8.
I vote against it :-)
While I agree that your proposal makes sense, I would advise against
implementing it before Qt 6. There are lots of programs out
On 11/08/16 02:08, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On quinta-feira, 11 de agosto de 2016 08:42:06 PDT Lorn Potter wrote:
>> Thanks for that.
>>
>> On Wednesday, 10 August 2016 11:35:06 PM AEST Sergio Ahumada wrote:
>> > yours has 41 lines and the reference only 38
>> > http
19 matches
Mail list logo
