Hi,
Qt Location provides three content/map provider plugins (HERE, MapBox and
MapQuest). The first two providers require an account to run and MapQuest was
free of any registration so far. Unfortunately this changed this Monday. More
details in:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-54599
As
On 2016-07-14, Thomas Senyk wrote:
I see neither one nor the other. I see continues 100% consume with no
memory consumption drop what so ever.
> should "fix" it? .. but I still see 100% cpu and same memory consumption?
I debugged some time ago a case of a unresponsive application (for 3
On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 19:08:11 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
> On 14.07.2016 18:56, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 18:37:17 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
> >> On 14.07.2016 18:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >>> On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 17:45:58 PDT Thom
On 14.07.2016 18:56, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 18:37:17 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
>> On 14.07.2016 18:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 17:45:58 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
should "fix" it? .. but I still see 100% cpu and same mem
On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 18:37:17 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
> On 14.07.2016 18:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 17:45:58 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
> >> should "fix" it? .. but I still see 100% cpu and same memory consumption?
> >
> > Can you attach the de
On 14.07.2016 18:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 17:45:58 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
>> should "fix" it? .. but I still see 100% cpu and same memory consumption?
>
> Can you attach the debugger to see what it is still doing after you're done?
>
Still the same, goes
On quinta-feira, 14 de julho de 2016 17:45:58 PDT Thomas Senyk wrote:
> should "fix" it? .. but I still see 100% cpu and same memory consumption?
Can you attach the debugger to see what it is still doing after you're done?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect
On 14.07.2016 16:48, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Thomas Senyk
> wrote:
>>
>> Is this expected? A bug? ... I'm happy to fill a bug report, I just
>> wanted to get some feedback, maybe I'm just doing something wrong
>
> First and foremost, which Qt version are you us
On 14.07.2016 17:18, André Somers wrote:
>
>
> Op 14/07/2016 om 17:10 schreef Olivier Goffart:
>> On Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016 16:33:26 CEST Thomas Senyk wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I lately wanted to validate that a connecting&disconnecting to a lambda
>>> will not leak the lambda object .. and found
On Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016 16:33:26 CEST Thomas Senyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I lately wanted to validate that a connecting&disconnecting to a lambda
> will not leak the lambda object .. and found that more then that is leaked.
>
> Here is my example: http://paste.ofcode.org/36dmWCT8ddF6Zaqb9csKZNv
>
Op 14/07/2016 om 17:10 schreef Olivier Goffart:
On Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2016 16:33:26 CEST Thomas Senyk wrote:
Hi,
I lately wanted to validate that a connecting&disconnecting to a lambda
will not leak the lambda object .. and found that more then that is leaked.
Here is my example: http://pa
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Thomas Senyk
wrote:
>
> Is this expected? A bug? ... I'm happy to fill a bug report, I just
> wanted to get some feedback, maybe I'm just doing something wrong
First and foremost, which Qt version are you using? :)
Cheers,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
__
Hi,
I lately wanted to validate that a connecting&disconnecting to a lambda
will not leak the lambda object .. and found that more then that is leaked.
Here is my example: http://paste.ofcode.org/36dmWCT8ddF6Zaqb9csKZNv
After the 10million connections are executed and disconnected (all of
them a
13 matches
Mail list logo
