On 24/06/16 02:12, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2016 23:37:57 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2016 16:42:14 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > I propose that we delete the bad tag, retag and rerelease with a better
>
You may start getting this error once you upgrade the compiler:
Plugin uses incompatible Qt library
expected build key "x86_64 linux g++-6 full-config", got "x86_64 linux g++-4
full-config"
"The plugin '/usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/styles/breeze.so' uses incompatible Qt
library. Expected build ke
On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2016 23:37:57 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2016 16:42:14 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I propose that we delete the bad tag, retag and rerelease with a better
> > name.
>
> Also: update MODULE_VERSION qtdeclarative/.qmake.conf. It MUST
> On 22 Jun 2016, at 11:17, Kevin Funk wrote:
> A platform agnostic wrapper for all this would be indeed great to have!
If QtWinExtra has it, QtMacExtra can have it, and it’s doable on Linux, why not
add
static methods on QProgressBar?
Mike
--
Mike Krus | mike.k...@kdab.com | Senior Software
Hi,
here’s the promised look at the details of the new system, in case you need to
implement your own configure tests or want to add configurability to Qt. We now
have one global configuration file qtbase/configure.json, that contains the
details about how Qt can be configured. Actually I’m sli
Hi,
As some of you might know, I’ve been working for some time now on developing a
new configuration system for Qt. As the first large change went in yesterday
evening, I guess it’s time I describe it a little, and also tell you a bit
about what’s still coming.
The goal of the new system is tw
