[Development] modbus over serial port on windows 7 ?

2016-05-30 Thread Dmitry Shapovalov
Hello, can someone confirm that modbus over serial port is working on windows ? all my experiments led me to the thought that it is absolutely broken. i am using arduno as a modbus device. i tested it with qmodbus and modbus poll. works great. but when i try to use modbus examples from qt(qtserialb

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2016 17:58:44 BRT Marc Mutz wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2016 15:12:01 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Sorry, I don't buy it. Instead: > > qmake -config ltcg > > I take that "I don't buy it" means that link-time compilation also warns > about unused data and functio

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Marc Mutz
On Monday 30 May 2016 15:12:01 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Sorry, I don't buy it. Instead: > qmake -config ltcg I take that "I don't buy it" means that link-time compilation also warns about unused data and function members? Anyway, until such a time as that becomes the default build mode f

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Wednesday 25 May 2016, Jake Petroules wrote: > Hi all, > > Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping OS X 10.9 and > iOS 7.x in Qt 5.8? This would follow dropping one OS X and iOS release per > Qt release for the past 3 releases, but after that I think we should slow > to drop

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2016 17:53:48 BRT Marc Mutz wrote: > This is orthogonal. > > Obviously, I have nothing against running moc only once per > library/executable, and applying optimisations such as string and sub-string > sharing across classes. I also have nothing against a single out

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Marc Mutz
On Monday 30 May 2016 16:24:38 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: > On Monday 30 of May 2016 10:19:38 Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple > > > headers > > > at the same time, producing only one ou

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2016 10:12:01 BRT Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2016, às 10:19:38 BRT, Marc Mutz escreveu: > > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple > > > headers > >

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On Monday 30 of May 2016 10:19:38 Marc Mutz wrote: > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple > > headers > > at the same time, producing only one output file > > Separate compilation is not how I would recommend

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2016, às 10:19:38 BRT, Marc Mutz escreveu: > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple > > headers > > at the same time, producing only one output file > > Separate compilation is n

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:19:38AM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote: > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple headers > > at the same time, producing only one output file > > Separate compilation is not how I would recom

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Shawn Rutledge
That’s my view too: 10.9 may be a popular holdout for years, like 10.6 was. Now the typical response would be: well you can still deploy Qt applications to it - doesn’t mean it has to be a supported developer platform. Or, developers can stop upgrading Qt and stick with 5.6 or so. Is that rea

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Mark Gaiser
If possible, please don't.. Unless there is a technical reason which would make dropping that version a requirement? I'm still on OSX 10.9 since i like it much more then the versions that came after it. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > Sounds good to me in principle, es

Re: [Development] Announcing moc_combine

2016-05-30 Thread Marc Mutz
On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple headers > at the same time, producing only one output file Separate compilation is not how I would recommend to use moc-generated files. I'd recommend to always include the

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Tim Blechmann
> Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping OS X 10.9 > and iOS 7.x in Qt 5.8? yes: it will prevent some users (including me) to update to qt-5.8, as our minimum osx requirement is still 10.9. ___ Development mailing list Development@q