I also see a growing trend at The Qt Company on trying to sell more commercial
licenses by creating fear because of the opensource licenses. At any corner you
hear „ohh, ohh that may not be legal to distribute, but just be sure buy a
license“. This makes me kind of sad. I love Qt, I love commerc
On Apr 19, 2016 6:49 PM, "Kojo Tero" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Point taken. The open source side does need to be more clearly visible.
>
> Currently the developer page is structured more toward the new user, with
the idea that more experienced users will visit again and find more
content, like the contri
On Tuesday 19 April 2016 13:19:34 Kojo Tero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Point taken. The open source side does need to be more clearly visible.
>
> Currently the developer page is structured more toward the new user, with
> the idea that more experienced users will visit again and find more
> content, like
Hi,
Point taken. The open source side does need to be more clearly visible.
Currently the developer page is structured more toward the new user, with the
idea that more experienced users will visit again and find more content, like
the contribution guidelines.
So the improvement idea can be sp
Hi,
On Tuesday 19 April 2016 12:50:20 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> I feel that with the unification, there is less and less visibility of the
> Qt open source project:
> The qt.io home page contains no information that Qt is open source and
> contains contributions from the community;
> The "Developer
Hi,
I feel that with the unification, there is less and less visibility of the Qt
open source project:
The qt.io home page contains no information that Qt is open source and
contains contributions from the community;
The "Developers" section, to which http://qt-project.org redirects, mostly
con
