[Development] QtQuick Call for Maintainer

2016-03-05 Thread Alan Alpert
Hi all, I have been drawn away from Qt Quick at work the past several months, for even I do not write back-end services with Qt Quick. Consequently I have not had time to fulfill the responsibilities of Qt Quick Maintainership and will have to pass the mantle onto someone new. Accepting the unfor

Re: [Development] How can Qt 5.6.0 MinGW pass in CI with QTBUG-49971 open?

2016-03-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Knoll Lars wrote: > Curtis Mitch wrote: >>Ferocious Triceratops Baring Fearsome Strength? Phew. I thought we'd >>gotten rid of all of those! > > Took me two minutes to parse that one as well. Failure to build from > source. FTBFS is an acronym that, as far as I can tell, originated from Debian, b

Re: [Development] debug symbols for official Qt releases

2016-03-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Friday 04 March 2016 14:36:05 Ulf Hermann wrote: > > Yes, of course we can, but it requires more work to do, so it is better to > > evaluate the size first :-) > > I can tell you right away that debug symbols are insanely large. Just create > a debug build of Qt and notice that it's gigabytes