On domingo, 28 de fevereiro de 2016 18:52:30 PST Vincas Dargis wrote:
> 2016.02.28 17:37, Olivier Goffart rašė:
> > Since QBasicAtomic is a literal type, it is going to be initialized at
> > compile time and can be used without mutexes.
>
> That's interesting, thanks.
>
> Though should I add TODO
2016.02.28 17:37, Olivier Goffart rašė:
Since QBasicAtomic is a literal type, it is going to be initialized at compile
time and can be used without mutexes.
That's interesting, thanks.
Though should I add TODO for the future to simplify it when MSVC2013 support ends? Or it
could be like that
Am Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016, 16:08:44 CET schrieb Vincas Dargis:
> Hello,
>
> If Qt 5.7 are going to support only "proper" C++11 compilers, can new Qt
> code assume that function local static variable initialization is
> thread-safe?
>
> Qt 5.7 Wiki page [1] makes me think that only Visual Studio
Hello,
If Qt 5.7 are going to support only "proper" C++11 compilers, can new Qt code assume that function local static variable
initialization is thread-safe?
Qt 5.7 Wiki page [1] makes me think that only Visual Studio 2013 and above are supported, is that right? If so, it
appears that "magic