On domingo, 21 de fevereiro de 2016 07:01:57 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> > Thiago Macieira kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello
7.15:
> >> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> >> wrote: Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang
> >> 3.5 to use deleted
On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote:
> Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of
> supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with
> different people, here's an initial proposal from my side:
Let me just say
My 0.02$:
On Saturday 20 February 2016 19:04:18 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> - delegating constructors
This can help reduce code size (both source and executable) for types with
many constructors. E.g. QTreeWidgetitem, or QStringView.
> - "explicit operator" member funcvtions
Safe bool operators,
On Sunday 21 February 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang 3.5 to use
> > deleted constructors in Chromium. Clang 3.4 has a bug which will cause it
> > to claim
> Holger Freyther kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello 12.19:
>
>
>> On 21 Feb 2016, at 08:01, Turunen Tuukka
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> That would drop FreeBSD 10.2, which is the current stable release today.
>>>
>>
>> According to their release plans both 10.3 and 11.0 should be out well
>> before
> On 21 Feb 2016, at 08:01, Turunen Tuukka
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> That would drop FreeBSD 10.2, which is the current stable release today.
>>
>
> According to their release plans both 10.3 and 11.0 should be out well before
> Qt 5.8.
Is 10.3 going to upgrade clang? I would assume that stable/
