Re: [Development] Qt 5.7 new features: MAINTAINERS, your input needed!

2016-02-12 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi, Idea is the same as with earlier releases, i.e. to mention only the most important features from user's viewpoint. Automatically generated list of all commits typically does not work even for the full change log, because it contains also unnecessary items. For the high level feature list i

Re: [Development] Documentation for methods of QML basic type

2016-02-12 Thread Smith Martin
qdoc doesn't support it yet, because it wasn't done before. I will add it. martin From: Development on behalf of Nikita Krupenko Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:24 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Documentation for methods

[Development] Documentation for methods of QML basic type

2016-02-12 Thread Nikita Krupenko
Hi all! I'm working on adding methods to basic QML type (color) and I need to document it. What qdoc tags should I use for this methods to be included into doc? I tried to use "\qmlmethod" but it does not work (or I do something wrong). I have suspicion, that qdoc does not support documenting met

Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project

2016-02-12 Thread Erik Larsson
+1 fredag 12 februari 2016 skrev Guillaume Charbonnier < gcharbonn...@simplisim.net>: > Hi all, > > Following engin.io services ramping down notification, Qt mobile > developers (like me) are lacking a MBaaS (mobile backend as a service) > that would play nicely with Qt. > I think this lack could

[Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.7 branching ongoing

2016-02-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
with some rather significant delay, the 5.7 branch is now available. please start using it for new changes intented for the Qt 5.7 release. we will downmerge dev to 5.7 the last time in a few days - i don't know any particular date, but it may be *quite* soon, as we're running late. it's recommen

Re: [Development] Extending touch semantic information and Qt backends

2016-02-12 Thread Ariel Molina
Further investigating i just read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/input/multi-touch-protocol.txt Which is a good read about the status of multitouch in the Kernel, moreover it explains the type of objects to be reported which are divided non identifiable and identifiable objects. Moreov

Re: [Development] Qt 5.7 new features: MAINTAINERS, your input needed!

2016-02-12 Thread Marc Mutz
On Friday 12 February 2016 16:51:14 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Maintainers, please update the list for your modules or in case there is > nothing important, delete your module from the list. Is there any particular reason this needs to be hand-edited instead of being automatically generated from [Ch

Re: [Development] Qt 5.7 new features: MAINTAINERS, your input needed!

2016-02-12 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi, Looking at http://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.7 there is already a lot of content, but nothing is listed under the following modules: * Qt Core * Qt GUI * Qt Network * Qt Widgets * Qt Test * Qt WebView * Qt Multimedia *

Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project

2016-02-12 Thread BRM via Development
Sounds great as well...while I'd like something for Mobile, I also need something accessible for non-Mobile so the two can easily integrate.(E.g mobile applications and desktop applications integrating for a shared experience). $0.02 Ben On Friday, February 12, 2016 10:10 AM, ekke wrote:

Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project

2016-02-12 Thread ekke
+1 this sounds great - I'm also looking for BaaS with Qt Mobile development Am 12.02.16 um 14:57 schrieb Guillaume Charbonnier: > Hi all, > > Following engin.io services ramping down > notification, Qt mobile developers (like me) are lacking a MBaaS > (mobile backend as a servic

[Development] Request for a new playground project

2016-02-12 Thread Guillaume Charbonnier
Hi all, Following engin.io services ramping down notification, Qt mobile developers (like me) are lacking a MBaaS (mobile backend as a service) that would play nicely with Qt. I think this lack could be quite a big impedance for the promotion of Qt for mobile development as

[Development] New Qt 5.6.0 RC snapshot available, please test

2016-02-12 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, We have finally packages for testing, Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.0-rc/335/ Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.0-rc/331/ Mac:http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.6/5.6.0-rc/271/ src:http://do

Re: [Development] API/ABI changes report

2016-02-12 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Friday 05 February 2016, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > Hello, > > I've started to maintain API/ABI changes report for the Qt library here: > http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/qt/ > > It took about two weeks to build and perform analysis for ~50 versions of > the library from 4.0 up to 5

Re: [Development] API/ABI changes report

2016-02-12 Thread Knoll Lars
On 12/02/16 08:50, "Development on behalf of Sune Vuorela" wrote: >On 2016-02-11, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> There are several remaining issues in the report. So I have some questions: >>> >>> - Is class QPlatformScreen private and all related changes should be removed >>> from the report? >>