Re: [Development] allow Qt for iOS to be built as shared libraries

On Dec 27, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Mike Krus mailto:mike.k...@kdab.com>> wrote: Hi has anybody taken this any further? Just pushed a new patch set which should be mergeable now pending no further complaints. Enabling dynamic builds as frameworks causes link errors. For example, when linking QtNet

Re: [Development] allow Qt for iOS to be built as shared libraries

Hi has anybody taken this any further? Enabling dynamic builds as frameworks causes link errors. For example, when linking QtNetwork.framework for the simulator, I get: ld: warning: ignoring file /.../qt5_ios/qtbase/lib/QtCore.framework/QtCore, missing required architecture i386 in file /.../q

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

El Sunday 27 December 2015, Kevin Kofler escribió: > I consider the C declarator syntax just fine, it is very intuitive and has > served us well for 26 years, so I don't see a need to change it. That some things have served up well for some time, that doesn't mean we can't find better things (ei