Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

2015-12-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Marc Mutz wrote: > There are a lot of problems with the C declarator syntax (implicit > narrowing conversions, hard-to-parse for humans, "most vexing parse", > non-uniformity), and auto and uniform init and template aliases are the > fixes. If you don't use them, then you're stuck in the C declarat

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

2015-12-26 Thread Bubke Marco
On December 25, 2015 13:24:43 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday 25 December 2015 10:35:02 Marc Mutz wrote: >> There are a lot of problems with the C declarator syntax (implicit >> narrowing conversions, hard-to-parse for humans, "most vexing parse", >> non-uniformity), and auto and uniform i