On Tuesday 27 October 2015 18:30:29 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Since this is an easy fix, can we count on the DW headers being fixed?
>
> If not, we should detect the mistake in the configure script and print the
> patch people should apply to their toolchains.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/13
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 18:03:22 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:52:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > A3) if not (if the constexpr methods in the Standard Library are missing)
> > but the toolchain supports with its constexpr methods, I can fix
> > the header. Constexpr is n
https://codereview.qt-project.org/121146 integrated, so configure.exe will now
refuse to compile with MSVC older than 2012, as discussed in the C++11 & LTS
thread in June.
The mkspec files remain if someone wants to compile non-Qt code using qmake.
I've just uninstalled MSVC 2010 from my Window
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:52:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> A3) if not (if the constexpr methods in the Standard Library are missing)
> but the toolchain supports with its constexpr methods, I can fix
> the header. Constexpr is not a mandatory feature outside of QAtomicInteger.
BTW, the header
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 16:40:07 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> The check for certain defines indicates that there are versions of DW with
> the necessary support. Are those available for QNX 6.6 toolchains?
>
> If so, how soon can the CI be upgraded to those toolchains?
>
> If not, we'll have to m
Hello QNX experts
ref https://codereview.qt-project.org/121146 and
http://testresults.qt.io/logs/qt/qtbase/5dae65fe1934e8565af317da17b4d8f42f1d7b8f/LinuxRHEL_6_6x86_64QNXQNX_660armv5GCCRelease_DisableTests_OpenGLES2/da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709/buildlog.txt.gz
For Qt 5.7, we agreed t
On 27.10.2015 21:07, Richard Moore wrote:
Not quite sure how Markus has managed not to be an approver.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Markus+Goetz+(Woboq+GmbH)%22,n,z
Rich.
He actually is an approver [1], but with an old email address.
Probably somebody forgot to add him with
On 27/10/15 22:34, "Development on behalf of Robin Burchell"
wrote:
>He already is
>(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/groups/12,members) - I guess
>it just never transferred to his other account.
Yes, indeed. Fortunately that's simple to fix :)
Markus should have all his approver rig
He already is
(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/groups/12,members) - I guess
it just never transferred to his other account.
--
Robin Burchell
ro...@viroteck.net
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 09:07 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
> Not quite sure how Markus has managed not to be an approver.
>
Not quite sure how Markus has managed not to be an approver.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Markus+Goetz+(Woboq+GmbH)%22,n,z
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Matthew Woehlke via Development
> wrote:
>> (Apologies for reposting information, but my other message is stuck
>> somewhere in the moderation queue...)
>>
>> On 2015-10-26 22:58, Thiago Macieira via Developme
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Matthew Woehlke via Development
wrote:
> (Apologies for reposting information, but my other message is stuck
> somewhere in the moderation queue...)
>
> On 2015-10-26 22:58, Thiago Macieira via Development wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 09:05:34 kl222 via Dev
(Apologies for reposting information, but my other message is stuck
somewhere in the moderation queue...)
On 2015-10-26 22:58, Thiago Macieira via Development wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 09:05:34 kl222 via Development wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira:
>>
>> 1. I think this is a bug. When using cm
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 3.6 beta1:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/10/27/qt-creator-3-6-beta1-released/
Br,
--
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula H
Hi,
According to the data from Google Play, there are currently only 7.4% of
active devices on Android versions 15 and below (< 4.1).
https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
Since this is a small and diminishing group and since the testing we are
doing on these old devi
15 matches
Mail list logo