Ok, many thanks, Thiago. It was that I want to know.
13.08.2015 0:06, Thiago Macieira пишет:
> On Wednesday 12 August 2015 22:12:43 Denis Shienkov wrote:
>> So, my question is: how to deprecate the specific enum value with a
>> right way for all compilers/platforms?
> Don't do it. There's no porta
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 23:17:31 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Hello Qt
>
> QtWebEngine and Chromium in the Qt 5.6 branch have been patched to allow
> linking with system libraries on Linux instead of bundled libraries. For
> most libraries the system library will be used if development files a
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 22:12:43 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> So, my question is: how to deprecate the specific enum value with a
> right way for all compilers/platforms?
Don't do it. There's no portable way yet. Maybe in a year or two we can
introduce a macro for it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago
> If you remove C due to the macro, then D is now equal to 3 from
incrementing its value based off of B's value instead of C.
Yes, I know it... But I talk not about it.. I talk about using
QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE in common case, according to enum values.
What if I need to deprecate the specific v
> Op 12 aug. 2015 om 19:52 heeft Keith Gardner het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:54 AM Denis Shienkov
>> wrote:
>> > skips three making Four == 3.
>>
>> yes, and what? :)
>>
>>
>> > This obviously needs to be:
>> > Four = 4
>>
>> Ok, seems it was a bad exam
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:54 AM Denis Shienkov
wrote:
> > skips three making Four == 3.
>
> yes, and what? :)
>
>
> > This obviously needs to be:
> > Four = 4
>
> Ok, seems it was a bad example with One-Four.. Let's consider another
> abstract example:
>
> enum Foo {
> A,
> B,
> #if QT_
> skips three making Four == 3.
yes, and what? :)
> This obviously needs to be:
> Four = 4
Ok, seems it was a bad example with One-Four.. Let's consider another
abstract example:
enum Foo {
A,
B,
#if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 2)
C,
#endif
D
};
2015-08-12 18:49 GMT+03:00 Poch
Though I did not notice that your 'One' is actually 0.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Denis Shienkov
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:45 PM
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Use
> #if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 2)
> Three,
> #endif
skips three making Four == 3.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Denis Shienkov
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:45 PM
Cc: development@qt-project.org
> This obviously needs to be:
>Four = 4
Sorry?
2015-08-12 17:37 GMT+03:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Wednesday 12 August 2015 15:36:22 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > Hi All.
> >
> > Is it possible to use QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro for the specific enum
> > values? And, is any restrictions related
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 15:36:22 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Is it possible to use QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro for the specific enum
> values? And, is any restrictions related to the different compilers?
>
> enum Numbers {
> One,
> Two,
> #if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 2)
> Thre
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 14:26:26 Robert Griebl wrote:
> >> Every LoggingCategory (In DLT it's called Context) needs to have a 3
> >> characters long unique identifier and a Description.
> >
> > Stupid API limitation. Can you convince GENIVI to get rid of the
> > 3-character identifier requirem
> See http://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/network/ssl/qssl.h.html#75
Yes, I saw it (I found about two mentions of QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE, related
to enum values in qtbase sources).
> Note that qdoc doesn't like it much.
So, this is too small because the qdoc does not like it? :)
BR,
Denis
2015
See http://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/network/ssl/qssl.h.html#75
Note that qdoc doesn't like it much.
Rich.
On 12 August 2015 at 13:36, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Is it possible to use QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro for the specific enum
> values? And, is any restrictions related to the
Hi All.
Is it possible to use QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro for the specific enum
values? And, is any restrictions related to the different compilers?
enum Numbers {
One,
Two,
#if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 2)
Three,
#endif
Four
};
BR,
Denis
__
On 12.08.2015 13:32, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 August 2015 09:55:14 Dominik Holland wrote:
>> Every Process which wants to log using DLT needs to provide information
>> about it's Application, this needs to be a 4 characters long unique
>> identifier and a Description for it.
>
> Sou
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 09:55:14 Dominik Holland wrote:
> > But I can't give a +1 right now for the API you have of DLT. That looks
> > like something Qt should automatically be doing. Have you explored that
> > possibility? Can you explain why it shouldn't / couldn't be done like
> > that?
> I
On Wednesday 12 August 2015, Robert Knight wrote:
> > QtWebEngine and Chromium in the Qt 5.6 branch have been patched to
> > allow linking with system libraries on Linux instead of bundled
> > libraries.
>
> What upstream changes have the Chromium team made to the bundled libraries
> compared to t
> > > What are the chances that such a change can be accepted ? (i mean, i can
> > > submit such a patch, but that would mean breaking a *lot* of code).
> >
> > QOptional does not exist yet and for very good reasons.
> >
> > QVariant is already in use, so I don't think you'd be sending a patch to u
On 08/11/2015 05:51 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 09:59:19 Dominik Holland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i would like to request a new qt module repository for QtGeniviExtras.
>>
>> The current code can be found here:
>> https://github.com/Pelagicore/qtgeniviextras
>>
>> The goal o
Le mardi 11 août 2015 à 10:10 -0700, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 18:45:10 Julien Blanc wrote:
> > Le mardi 11 août 2015 à 08:46 -0700, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> > > On Tuesday 11 August 2015 10:38:27 Julien Blanc wrote:
> > > > That point is certainly valid, but i would
21 matches
Mail list logo
