On Wednesday 01 July 2015 21:03:21 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I think we mostly avoid QPair in api's (because it is generally not very
> documenting in API). I don't see why std::tuple is any different.
I agree with Sune here. Please create your struct with the types in question
and proper names.
And
On 2015-06-26, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Can we have function that takes or return std::function, std::tuple,
> std::unique_ptr, std::vector?
While I can see the advantage of std::function, I'm not sure why we
would use the remaining ones in API ?
Thiago already mentioned that he didn't like std
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 18:55:24 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > My Chicago based sales rep told me that ( somewhere buried in my license
> > fine print ) I could not release software using unreleased versions of Qt
> > Enterprise.>
> >
>
> that makes sense for feature releases, but not for bugfi
>
> > For example, with moc removed we support template classes that inherit>
> > from QObject.
>
> Wow. I would (almost) kill for having that feature in Qt!
>
> You can work around it quite easily. What doesn’t work is adding new
> signals / slots inside a template class. So just add a base class
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 04:36:02PM +, Edward Sutton wrote:
> >>Is there a work-around I could use in my Qt project file?
>
> >Upgrade to 5.5.1. It's already fixed.
>
> >The problem was not deemed important enough to affect the 5.5.0 release.
>
>
> My Chicago based sales rep told me that ( s
>>Is there a work-around I could use in my Qt project file?
>Upgrade to 5.5.1. It's already fixed.
>The problem was not deemed important enough to affect the 5.5.0 release.
My Chicago based sales rep told me that ( somewhere buried in my license fine
print ) I could not release software using
30.06.2015, 23:38, "Bernhard" :
>> For example, with moc removed we support template classes that inherit
>> from QObject.
>
> Wow. I would (almost) kill for having that feature in Qt!
http://www.labri.fr/perso/guenneba/code/ppmoc.php
No C++11 required (code was written in 2008 or earlier)
-
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 15:15:19 Edward Sutton wrote:
> Is there a work-around I could use in my Qt project file?
Upgrade to 5.5.1. It's already fixed.
The problem was not deemed important enough to affect the 5.5.0 release.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Archit
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 07:20:18 Koehne Kai wrote:
> What I think would be very helpful is std::function though. We've a couple
> of places where we take function pointers with its awkward design and
> limitations. In others we start to have classes with just one virtual
> member ... This is all
Same issue here.
I had to modify qobjectdefs.h to define Q_OBJECT_NO_OVERRIDE_WARNING to nothing.
#if defined(Q_CC_CLANG) && Q_CC_CLANG >= 306
//# define Q_OBJECT_NO_OVERRIDE_WARNING
QT_WARNING_DISABLE_CLANG("-Winconsistent-missing-override”)
# define Q_OBJECT_NO_OVERRIDE_WARNING
#els
On Wednesday 1. July 2015 16:50:09 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just tried building Qt 5.5 with Xcode 6.3.2. It built, but emitted
> many warnings for each translation unit about
> -Winconsistent-missing-override.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/115201
It was just too late for Qt 5.5.0
Hello,
I just tried building Qt 5.5 with Xcode 6.3.2. It built, but emitted
many warnings for each translation unit about
-Winconsistent-missing-override.
In file included from
/Users/ske/dev/src/qt55/qtdeclarative/src/qml/debugger/qqmldebugserver.cpp:34:
In file included from
/Users/ske/dev/src/
Hi,
Qt 5.5 has just been released. For details check the blog post at
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/07/01/qt-5-5-released/ and http://www.qt.io/qt5-5/
Big thanks to everyone involved!
Br,
Akseli
___
Announce mailing list
annou...@qt-project.org
http://
Hi,
We are currently experiencing severe connectivity issues in our CI
infrastructure. As a result integrations staged in Gerrit are likely to fail,
hang or - in the worst case - kill kittens.
Digia IT is working on it.
Simon
___
Development mailing
> -Original Message-
> Subject: [Development] std:: in Qt ABI (was: Qt LTS & C++11 plans)
Side note: Outlook decides to not show the first four characters (std:) in the
Subject line/Compact View, and also drops it when Replying. WTF?
> [...]
> My understanding is that most (all?) Linux d
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:17 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Dev
Le mardi 30 juin 2015 à 22:37 +0200, Bernhard a écrit :
> > For example, with moc removed we support template classes that inherit
> > from QObject.
>
> Wow. I would (almost) kill for having that feature in Qt!
>
You can work around it quite easily. What doesn’t work is adding new
signals / s
17 matches
Mail list logo
