[Development] Qt 5.5.0 Final release 1.7.2015

2015-06-22 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, RC is finally out & we are planning to release Qt 5.5.0 1.7.2015. That's why we need to get final packages ready at the end of this week. And that's why we need all changes for Qt 5.5.0 final in latest Thu morning. So if you are still planning to update change files, documentation etc

Re: [Development] Qt & Namespaces (was: RE: Some Qt3D feedback)

2015-06-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 22 June 2015 20:51:30 Sune Vuorela wrote: > That way, we automatically become immune to crashes from having several > qt verisons in the same process, which is a thing that seems to happen > from time to time for a lot of people by accident. (and quite hard to > debug) Fixed by https://c

Re: [Development] Qt & Namespaces (was: RE: Some Qt3D feedback)

2015-06-22 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2015-06-18, Koehne Kai wrote: >> 1. Each Qt Module "Qt Foo" (name used in docs), with soname >>QtFoo, only exports symbols in namespace QtFoo, >>potentially with nested inline namespace V. > > This has the advantage of being a very simple, mechanical rule. But it's also > very burdensom

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 22 June 2015 10:35:56 rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > On 6/22/2015 9:16 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Monday 22 June 2015 06:56:25 rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Don't have the manpower? > >> > >> Then transfer LTS support over to a group of willing volunteers whose > >> businesses dep

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread rpzrpz...@gmail.com
On 6/22/2015 9:16 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 22 June 2015 06:56:25 rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: >> Don't have the manpower? >> >> Then transfer LTS support over to a group of willing volunteers whose >> businesses depend on it and let them handle as a GROUP the maintenance. > > Is anyone

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 22 June 2015 06:56:25 rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > Don't have the manpower? > > Then transfer LTS support over to a group of willing volunteers whose > businesses depend on it and let them handle as a GROUP the maintenance. Is anyone volunteering? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread Gunnar Roth
Yes thats wrong, proved by practice and ms support finally. This arcticle will be changed as MS promised that to us, but until this task bubbles up inside MS  can take a while.   Regards, Gunnar     Gesendet: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 um 15:02 Uhr Von: "Al-Khanji Louai" An: "Gunnar Roth" , "Kno

Re: [Development] Specifying module dependencies

2015-06-22 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On Monday, June 22, 2015 11:27:33 AM Al-Khanji Louai wrote: > > To the CI system the optional dependencies are > > also required ones. > > So we're not going to test the optionality of said dependencies? That is currently correct. We assume that we have all Qt modules that are dependencies. That

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread Al-Khanji Louai
So this bit in the article is not factual? "Windows Embedded Compact no longer provides its own tool chain (compiler, assembler, and make), but instead use the same tools as desktop development." Louai > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+louai.al-khanji=theqtcompany.com@qt

Re: [Development] QtCS: Long Term Release discussion

2015-06-22 Thread rpzrpz...@gmail.com
Don't have the manpower? Then transfer LTS support over to a group of willing volunteers whose businesses depend on it and let them handle as a GROUP the maintenance. Provide a space on the the Qt Web Site for organizing reasons and make it officially a "community" only supported pile of code.

[Development] QtCS: Qt Quick Performance discussion

2015-06-22 Thread Robin Burchell
It seems that nobody took proper notes of the session (oops!) so I'm sending the notes Gunnar and I wrote up in preparation for the session. If anyone else has any recollections they'd like to add, please go ahead and do so :) = # Performance! * Why it's important * What needs to be checked?

Re: [Development] QtCS: Notes from Modern C++ session

2015-06-22 Thread Al-Khanji Louai
Unfortunately that's not accurate. As I said during the session, no released version of MSVC supports the feature properly: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx#defaultedanddeleted As I understand it, that's also the reason that defaulted and deleted functions are listed as pa

Re: [Development] Specifying module dependencies

2015-06-22 Thread Al-Khanji Louai
> To the CI system the optional dependencies are > also required ones. So we're not going to test the optionality of said dependencies? Louai > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+louai.al-khanji=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+louai.al- > khanj

[Development] Make Qt WebView a Qt Add-on

2015-06-22 Thread Stromme Christian
Hi, The Qt WebView module has been a tech preview for 5.4 and is still going to be a tech preview for 5.5, but for 5.6 we would like to propose that it gets upgraded to an official Qt add-on. Making the module an add-on, and also making it part of the normal release infrastructure, should hopefu

[Development] Qt 5.5.0 RC released

2015-06-22 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, Qt 5.5.0 RC is now released, see http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/06/22/qt-5-5-release-candidate-available/ Big thanks to everyone involved! Best regards, Jani Heikkinen Release Manager | The Qt Company The Qt Company / Digia Finland Ltd, Elektroniikkatie 10, 90590 Oulu, Finland