Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot available

> I just went through the git log to confirm. There is nothing of > interest to put in the changelog for QtQuick1 or QtScript (I'd be > surprised if I found otherwise). Do you really need an empty file > there? I'd say yes. It is information for our customers. No file doesn't tell the differenc

Re: [Development] Some Qt3D feedback

Hi, If some of the fixes are critical to have in Qt 5.5.0, they should be targeted to that branch. Please discuss with Jani Heikkinen, and add to release meta task. All non-critical fixes to 5.5, of course. Doc fixes should be safe to go into 5.5.0 branch - and in many ways these are critical

Re: [Development] changes to qtbase continuous integration and testing

On 09/06/15 21:59, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Hi, > [snip] Is there a url to see the test results of various platforms/modules? ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot available

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Heikkinen Jani wrote: > Hi all, > > > New snapshot for Qt5.5.0 RC available. > > Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.5/5.5.0-rc/2015-06-05_79/ > > Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.5/5.5.0-rc/2015-06-05_101/ > > Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapsho

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtQuick.diff

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:20 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >> > Looks good. Looks good to me as well. I'll try to produce a QML API diff to look through later today. -- Alan Alpert ___ Development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtDeclarative.diff

I started working on something that would diff QML API changes a while ago: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/52625/ It's a little tricky, but it basically is just diffing the plugins.qmltypes files. After regenerating them and having old "full" copies because of the manual editing that occurs

Re: [Development] qqmlengine/qqmlimport access

Simon: I just finished reviewing the QQuickImageProvider framework and that might also be an known interface pattern acceptable to the team. Component { source: "memory://myqmlprovider/myqmlcomponent" } And it may just "fit" nicely into the current "qrc:" pattern. Just my 2 cents... md On 6/9

[Development] [QtCS] QML Runtime Session Summary

The QML runtime session explained the existence and rationale for the QML runtime (qtdeclarative/tools/qml). The rationale is that it is more generic than just qmlscene, yet is configurable to have the same level of convenience for QtQuick (among others). It has a runtime configuration file which c

[Development] [QtCS] QtRemoteObjects Session Summary

There was late-scheduled session on QtRemoteObjects at QtCS on Saturday. QtRemoteObjects is a playground module for object remoting of QObjects, and can be found at http://code.qt.io/cgit/playground/qtremoteobjects.git/ . A brief overview of the existing features: -Exports QObjects remotely, creat

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

On 09/06/15 16:41, "development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany@qt-project.org on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Tuesday 09 June 2015 07:35:45 Knoll Lars wrote: >> On 08/06/15 23:58, "development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany.com@qt- >project.org on behalf of Thiago Macieira" bo

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtWidgets.diff

On Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:40:59 Sorvig Morten wrote: > > On 08 Jun 2015, at 11:07, Marc Mutz wrote: > > > > On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:27 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > >> diff --git a/src/widgets/widgets/qmaccocoaviewcontainer_mac.h > >> b/src/widgets/widgets/qmaccocoaviewcontainer_mac.h index >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtWidgets.diff

> On 08 Jun 2015, at 11:07, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Friday 05 June 2015 10:11:27 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >> diff --git a/src/widgets/widgets/qmaccocoaviewcontainer_mac.h >> b/src/widgets/widgets/qmaccocoaviewcontainer_mac.h index a98d30f..5920c1f >> 100644 >> --- a/src/widgets/widgets/qmaccocoa

Re: [Development] changes to qtbase continuous integration and testing

On Tuesday 09 June 2015 13:59:29 Simon Hausmann wrote: > Re-prioritization means for us that we'll do this switch sooner in order to > maintain a certain level of quality, at the expense of not having a public > web frontend and other features in the CI system available before the > switch but som

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

On Tuesday 09 June 2015 07:35:45 Knoll Lars wrote: > On 08/06/15 23:58, "development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany.com@qt- project.org on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: > >On Monday 08 June 2015 22:31:15 Marc Mutz wrote: > >> It would probably be a good idea to do an additional header diff (i

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtCore.diff

On Tuesday 09 June 2015 12:10:02 Olivier Goffart wrote: > A change in the IsGadget flag is fine. > > Old code did not need this flag. And code that relies on it requires anyway > that the code that register the types register the isGadget flag. > > Even if one could build a complicated use case t

Re: [Development] qqmlengine/qqmlimport access

Robin: I am fairly new to the process, and just eyeballing the source trees does not give me a working understanding how the render thread and the GUI thread play nice together. So knowing the point at which to add a call to int QQmlEngine::addComponent(QByteArray& gbqml,QString gsimportname)

[Development] changes to qtbase continuous integration and testing

Hi, In the past two weeks we've made some "interesting" discoveries regarding our test coverage, specifically regarding qtbase, but the same applies also to qt5.git: * Our networking stack is only tested on OS X 10.10. Due to what seems like a bug in the test planner, the tests are not fully

Re: [Development] qqmlengine/qqmlimport access

On 6/9/2015 1:02 AM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > On Tuesday, June 02, 2015 03:44:59 PM rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: >> On 5/29/2015 9:53 AM, mark diener wrote: >>> Hello dev list: >> Maybe after the 5.5 release, I would like to explore adding public >> access member functions to QQmlEngine.h/cpp: >> >> i

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:32AM +, Heikkinen Jani wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to create error reports about the findings to be able to follow-up > the progress. Please create new one if something is missing. > the point was about the entirely new headers that were not in the diffs, i.e., enti

Re: [Development] Some Qt3D feedback

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Sean Harmer wrote: > On Monday 08 Jun 2015 14:18:33 Sean Harmer wrote: >> >> On Monday 08 Jun 2015 01:11:23 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> > 2) A private header is included in a public header: >> > include/Qt3DCore$ grep private/ *.h >> > qaspectjobmanager.h:#include >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

Hi, I tried to create error reports about the findings to be able to follow-up the progress. Please create new one if something is missing. I have also linked all to the Qt5.5.0-RC blocker list so please try to close all as soon as possible. I'll ask LEs from responsible persons today to be abl

Re: [Development] Your actions needed, Qt5.5.0 RC & Final is nearing!

On Tuesday June 09 2015 10:28:49 Sorvig Morten wrote: > A quick correction: QtBase (the module) includes QtGui and QtWidgets. You > were thinking QtCore? Sorry, yes, I've lost track a bit of what the minimal collection of components is for applications that can serve an actual purpose :) René

Re: [Development] Your actions needed, Qt5.5.0 RC & Final is nearing!

> On 09 Jun 2015, at 11:18, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Tuesday June 09 2015 08:27:09 Sorvig Morten wrote: > >> I think it’s OK if other modules, and especially new modules, have stricter >> requirements. Qt users can make a decision if the provided OS version >> support is acceptable befo

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtCore.diff

On Monday 8. June 2015 17:57:23 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 08 June 2015 15:58:23 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > > There is no reason to stop improving qmetatype. > > > > > > The qFatal was there for a good reason. > > > > It was there for a good reason for the existing flags. > > But for ne

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:35:45AM +, Knoll Lars wrote: > On 08/06/15 23:58, > "development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany@qt-project.org on behalf of > Thiago Macieira" > thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > >On Monday 08 June 2015 22:31:15 Marc Mutz wrote: > >> It would probably be

[Development] qqmlengine/qqmlimport access

>>* There are the blunt force methods of QQmlEngine->clearComponentCache() *>>* and QQmlEngine->trimComponentCache(). *>> >>* Maybe after the 5.5 release, I would like to explore adding public *>>* access member functions to QQmlEngine.h/cpp: *>> >>* int QQmlEngine::loadComponent(QQmlComponent& com

Re: [Development] qqmlengine/qqmlimport access

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, at 11:44 PM, rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > Another concern I have is the Render Thread issues VS Gui thread issues. Can you elaborate on this concern? The current description is impossible to address, which might explain the lack of response. -- Robin Burchell ro...@virot

Re: [Development] Your actions needed, Qt5.5.0 RC & Final is nearing!

On Tuesday June 09 2015 08:27:09 Sorvig Morten wrote: >I’m aiming for supporting 10.7 as “deprecated” in the 5.5 release. It >currently does not compile - the lack of CI testing is showing. It *may* be possible to get a community-supported CI set up for 10.7 (where community probably implies KD

Re: [Development] Some Qt3D feedback

On Monday 08 Jun 2015 14:18:33 Sean Harmer wrote: > > On Monday 08 Jun 2015 01:11:23 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > 2) A private header is included in a public header: > > include/Qt3DCore$ grep private/ *.h > > qaspectjobmanager.h:#include > > > > This is concerning - Don't we have a unit test prev

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff: QtMultimedia.diff

On Tuesday 09 June 2015 00:27:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: > But Qt API that doesn't explicitly need an array for the data should > continue to use QList. I disagree insofar as it concerns new types. Either a new type put into a QList is optimally efficient (sizeof == sizeof void* and at least Q_M

Re: [Development] Your actions needed, Qt5.5.0 RC & Final is nearing!

> On 05 Jun 2015, at 19:00, Sean Harmer wrote: > > On 05/06/2015 14:52, René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> On Friday June 05 2015 13:30:58 Sean Harmer wrote: >> could QTBUG-46143 possibly be added to the list of blockers? it is a P1 bug in qt3d/qt5.5, as it does not build against the macos10.

Re: [Development] Qt Location and Geoclue 2

On 9 June 2015 at 06:22, Aaron McCarthy wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:25:12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Hi! I have just received a bug [debbug] in which geoclue maintainrs > states > > that he wants to get geoclue removed in favor of geoclue2. And it seems > I'm > > no

Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot available

From: Heikkinen Jani mailto:jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com>> Date: Tuesday 9 June 2015 10:21 To: Richard Moore mailto:r...@kde.org>> Cc: "development@qt-project.org" mailto:development@qt-project.org>> Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot a

Re: [Development] Qt 5.5.0 header diff

On 08/06/15 23:58, "development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany@qt-project.org on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Monday 08 June 2015 22:31:15 Marc Mutz wrote: >> It would probably be a good idea to do an additional header diff (incl. new >> headers) on the ML after the alpha. I do

Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot available

>> On 9 June 2015 at 00:48, Richard Moore wrote: >> On 8 June 2015 at 05:59, Heikkinen Jani >> mailto:jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com>> >> wrote: Maintainers: For the coming releases please make sure - All findings from header diff is fixed today ?? ? >> ?Please don't make impossible requ