Thankyou Thiago! good to know that it is posible to share the includes.
Anyway propably I will take the easiest option: separate the includes
entirely.
Best
2015-06-06 0:23 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Wednesday 03 June 2015 08:20:23 Soraya Santana de la Fe wrote:
> > I have found the proble
Hi,
To develop and use application-specific class for
an application instead the default UIApplication,
user may wish to pass the name of an UIApplication derivative
to iOS in UIApplicationMain
In qioseventdispatcher.mm nil is passed as the 3-rd argument:
return UIApplicationMain(argc, argv, nil,
Hi all,
New snapshot for Qt5.5.0 RC available.
Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.5/5.5.0-rc/2015-06-05_79/
Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.5/5.5.0-rc/2015-06-05_101/
Mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.5/5.5.0-rc/2015-06-05_83/
Content is not the final RC one bu
Hello,
Congrats to Paul, Sean and others working on getting this module in a
releasable state for Qt 5.5!
I have not reviewed the code, but I found some items to raise:
1) The include/Qt3DCore/Window file doesn't have a Q prefix.
as every other header does. Should probably be Qt3DWindow.
2)
On Thursday, June 04, 2015 16:01:01 Aleix Pol wrote:
>
> Is it really that much work? I hear there's tools to do so [1] and
> it's the compiler telling whether it's correct or not.
>
> Aleix
I've added Q_DECL_OVERRIDE to some kdepim libraries with clang-modernize and 5
minutes of my time.
I a
On 06/06/15 10:04,
"development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany@qt-project.org on behalf of
Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On Friday 05 June 2015 10:10:46 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>> +#ifndef QT_NO_DRAGANDDROP
>> +virtual void dragEnterEvent(QDragEnterEvent *);
>> +virtual void dragMov
On 06/06/15 15:26,
"development-bounces+lars.knoll=theqtcompany@qt-project.org on behalf of
Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On Saturday 06 June 2015 14:22:20 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> Il 06/06/2015 13:27, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
>> > Then why do we need them in QSslSocket?
>>
>> Technical
On Saturday 6. June 2015 10:04:09 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2015 10:10:44 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
> No changes, good.
>
> We ought to stop revving the version number for libraries that did not
> update at all...
Maybe there was no API, But if you look a git loog, you will see
