Hi!
I cannot see QTBUG-44645 blocking the release, sorry
Br,
Jani
From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com]
Sent: 3. kesäkuuta 2015 13:01
To: Heikkinen Jani
Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Your actions needed, Qt5.5.0 RC & Final is nearing!
O
On Wednesday 3. June 2015 18:56:05 Milian Wolff wrote:
> void QAbstractItemModelPrivate::Persistent::insertMultiAtEnd(const
> QModelIndex& key, QPersistentModelIndexData *data)
> {
> +Q_ASSERT(indexes.count(key) < 2);
> QHash::iterator newIt =
> -indexes.insertMulti(key, data
On Wednesday 03 June 2015 22:23:45 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Wednesday 3. June 2015 18:32:46 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > for a customer I looked into the performance of a model/view application
> > with many (and I mean, many!) add/remove/modify operations on a model with
> > a QSor
On Wednesday 3. June 2015 18:32:46 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> for a customer I looked into the performance of a model/view application
> with many (and I mean, many!) add/remove/modify operations on a model with
> a QSortFilterProxyModel on top. The obvious solution to speed things up is
>
On Wednesday 03 June 2015 18:32:46 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> for a customer I looked into the performance of a model/view application
> with many (and I mean, many!) add/remove/modify operations on a model with
> a QSortFilterProxyModel on top. The obvious solution to speed things up is
>
Hey all,
for a customer I looked into the performance of a model/view application with
many (and I mean, many!) add/remove/modify operations on a model with a
QSortFilterProxyModel on top. The obvious solution to speed things up is
batching, which works nicely paired with layout{AboutToBe,}Chan
I don’t see a problem doing further updates to 3rd party libraries for
5.5.1.
Cheers,
Lars
On 03/06/15 15:33, "Helio Chissini de Castro" wrote:
>I asked for the update after the list was updated in
>https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xOAI87zKy6w7VSvSzQrIA_zeZBLuTgoSmNU-vAXr
>IhY&authuser=0
>
>AF
I asked for the update after the list was updated in
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xOAI87zKy6w7VSvSzQrIA_zeZBLuTgoSmNU-vAXrIhY&authuser=0
AFAIK, this is the last status, and the only significant older library is
libjpeg but no one gave green light to do it.
And i not verified the status of one
Den 03-06-2015 kl. 12:26 skrev André Somers:
>> If you really want to modify the output of current...() then you might
>> >consider preloading a library over Qt that does it for you.
>> >
> I am considering that option as well, but that would require me to hook
> into the windows kernel calls. Like
Hi!
I would really love to see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-46080 fixed
for a final release... that one drives me crazy!
Best Regards,
Tobias
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listin
Bo Thorsen schreef op 3-6-2015 om 11:44:
> Den 03-06-2015 kl. 08:38 skrev André Somers:
>> We have applications that use the current date and time at places spread
>> around the code. For normal operations, that works very nicely. However,
>> we find that for (auto) testing, it would be very conven
On 3 June 2015 at 14:45, Heikkinen Jani
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> We are quite close to Qt 5.5.0 RC & final releases. Plan is to put RC
> out Thu 11.6.2015 & Final Tue 23.6.2015. To be able to keep the schedule we
> need to make sure all real blockers are fixed in RC so that it will be
> really RC
Den 03-06-2015 kl. 08:38 skrev André Somers:
> We have applications that use the current date and time at places spread
> around the code. For normal operations, that works very nicely. However,
> we find that for (auto) testing, it would be very convenient if we could
> trick the application into
Hi!
Thanks Sean, it would be good to get this fixed. But I don't see this a blocker
for Qt5.5.0 because Qt3D is tech preview...
Br,
Jani
>>-Original Message-
>>From: releasing-bounces+jani.heikkinen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
>>[mailto:releasing-bounces+jani.heikkinen=theqtcompany.
On Wednesday 03 Jun 2015 11:05:35 Tim Blechmann wrote:
> > We are quite close to Qt 5.5.0 RC & final releases. Plan is to put RC
> > out Thu 11.6.2015 & Final Tue 23.6.2015. To be able to keep the schedule
> > we need to make sure all real blockers are fixed in RC so that it will
> > be really RC &
> We are quite close to Qt 5.5.0 RC & final releases. Plan is to put RC
> out Thu 11.6.2015 & Final Tue 23.6.2015. To be able to keep the schedule
> we need to make sure all real blockers are fixed in RC so that it will
> be really RC & there won't be so much changes between RC & Final. So
> follo
Curtis Mitch schreef op 3-6-2015 om 10:00:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
>> [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
>> On Behalf Of André Somers
>> Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2015 8:39 AM
>> To:
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of André Somers
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2015 8:39 AM
> To:
> Subject: [Development] date/time adjust for (
Hi, I also had the same needs for testing my app, on different times of
the day or year etc. But instead of patching Windows or some Qt code, I
created a new virtual Windows VM in WMWare, and deployed my app into it.
Switched off "Synchronize guest time with host" in the Options, and
whenever I
* André Somers [2015-06-03 08:38:48 +0200]:
> We have applications that use the current date and time at places spread
> around the code. For normal operations, that works very nicely. However,
> we find that for (auto) testing, it would be very convenient if we could
> trick the application in
20 matches
Mail list logo
