On 27/05/15 03:04, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:47:04 Simon Hausmann wrote:
>> My first suggestion is to give the module a better name. "Bus" is an
>> overloaded term with many meanings and it is IMO too close to our "DBus"
>> module. Why not go with what your first sentence i
On 26/05/15 13:56, "Marc Mutz" wrote:
>On Saturday 23 May 2015 19:47:28 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Saturday 23 May 2015 15:35:23 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > I’ve created a QVector of QImages and tried to insert an image in the
>> > vector: QVector images;
>> > images.insert(image
On 26/05/15 20:14, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Tuesday 26 May 2015 17:40:05 Viironen Kalle wrote:
>> On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>>
>>
>> >On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:19:26 Hausmann Simon wrote:
>> >
>> >>Good point :)
>> >>I was under the assumption that the concepts are too di
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:46:08 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2015 23:33:34 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I think it's time to institute a policy that we should fix our sources to
> > use the new C++11 keywords. I'd like to propose the following.
>
> Can we move all (excl
That was it!
While I've used QSettings many times I didn't thought of inserting the
identifiers for the QML Settings. Documentation is not strict about that,
probably because it's obvious that identifiers are needed.
I knew it was some stupid mistake of mine! :-/
Well, thanks a lot!
F.
On 13 Ma
On Thursday 08 January 2015 23:33:34 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> I think it's time to institute a policy that we should fix our sources to
> use the new C++11 keywords. I'd like to propose the following.
Can we move all (excl. Q_NULLPTR, which is controversial) forward?
Thanks,
Marc
--
