Is there any reason that static build of QtWebKit isn't enabled for
msvc2012? I just tried adding win32-msvc2012 to
Tools/qmake/mkspecs/features/configure.prf around line 129 and the
build went fine. Is it simply a matter of it not being tested/not
wanting to support it in the future?
Should I ope
In case you're on Qt 4.x, look at QFont <-> QString and QFont <->
QDataStream (|de)serialization. I recall there was a bug fixed in ~5.3,
though I don't know if it was backported to 4.x.
Konstantin
2015-04-18 14:34 GMT+04:00 René J.V. :
> Hello,
>
> The specific question: how/where is (QFontEng
On 23.04.2015 14:30, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday April 23 2015 11:13:41 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>> René, maybe this helps you a bit:
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/111056/
>>
>> It's only a incomplete copy and paste of your Qt 4 patch,
>> but it could show you the direction.
>
>
On 23.04.2015 20:31, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday April 23 2015 16:58:05 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>
>> Because the gerrit code is Qt5 not Qt4.
>
> Doh ... I wondered about that and should have realised it was the case seeing
> the dialoghelper file on the list.
>
>> So it needs a complete rev
On Thursday April 23 2015 16:58:05 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>Because the gerrit code is Qt5 not Qt4.
Doh ... I wondered about that and should have realised it was the case seeing
the dialoghelper file on the list.
>So it needs a complete review and test by you if it works on Mac,
Actually, I am st
It won't write anything to the framebuffer though. As long as you do not create
an actual window (only use QOffscreenSurface, not QWindow) and do not call
swapBuffers() there will be nothing written out. How and when the EGL
implementation opens the framebuffer is not under Qt's or the applicati
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks!
>
> Why an incomplete copy/paste? I see it's missing the changes to
> tools/qtconfig/mainwindow.cpp, did you omit other changes as well?
Because the gerrit code is Qt5 not Qt4.
So it needs a complete review and test by you if it works on Mac,
I don't have a Mac.
Pete
Sean,
I took a look at the example, and this all looks good. However, I think my
platform will still grab a handle to the framebuffer. I will be using an
i.MX6 device, and the configuration would use the following EGLFS hook.
https://github.com/qtproject/qtbase/blob/befe1e37e28db95a79622d628a338f
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 3.4.0:
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/04/23/qt-creator-3-4-0-released/
Best regards from the Qt Creator team
--
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika P
On Thursday 23 April 2015, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 04/23/2015 02:34 PM, André Somers wrote:
> > What is the problem with using
> >
> > Image {
> >
> > source: "someImage.jpg"
> > autorotate: true
> >
> > }
> >
> > Again: note that QImage != QML Image
> >
> > I don't like global
Just FYI,
http://www.daveperrett.com/articles/2012/07/28/exif-orientation-handling-is-a-ghetto/
http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16684/ipad-and-iphone-browser-rotating-images-on-site
(note that OS from Apple is a bit "special")
and the CSS3 working group discussion:
http://lists.w3.or
On Thursday April 23 2015 11:13:41 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> René, maybe this helps you a bit:
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/111056/
>
> It's only a incomplete copy and paste of your Qt 4 patch,
> but it could show you the direction.
Hi Peter,
Thanks!
Why an incomplete copy/paste? I s
2015-04-23 16:04 GMT+04:00 Alberto Mardegan :
> On 04/23/2015 02:34 PM, André Somers wrote:
> > What is the problem with using
> >
> > Image {
> > source: "someImage.jpg"
> > autorotate: true
> > }
> >
> > Again: note that QImage != QML Image
> >
> > I don't like globals if they can be
On 04/23/2015 02:34 PM, André Somers wrote:
> What is the problem with using
>
> Image {
> source: "someImage.jpg"
> autorotate: true
> }
>
> Again: note that QImage != QML Image
>
> I don't like globals if they can be avoided. In this case, I think they can.
I could certainly live with
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 13:20, Alberto Mardegan
> wrote:
>
> On 04/23/2015 01:36 PM, Gunnar Sletta wrote:
>> I think we should strive to not introduce regressions on purpose. Hence:
>> - Revert the behavioral change in 5.4 which adds rotation to JPEGs
>> - Have opt-in rotation in QImageReader.
>
Alberto Mardegan schreef op 23-4-2015 om 13:20:
> On 04/23/2015 01:36 PM, Gunnar Sletta wrote:
>> I think we should strive to not introduce regressions on purpose. Hence:
>>- Revert the behavioral change in 5.4 which adds rotation to JPEGs
>>- Have opt-in rotation in QImageReader.
>>- K
On 04/23/2015 01:36 PM, Gunnar Sletta wrote:
> I think we should strive to not introduce regressions on purpose. Hence:
> - Revert the behavioral change in 5.4 which adds rotation to JPEGs
> - Have opt-in rotation in QImageReader.
> - Keep TIFF rotation as it is (and change it to the Qt-wide
I think we should strive to not introduce regressions on purpose. Hence:
- Revert the behavioral change in 5.4 which adds rotation to JPEGs
- Have opt-in rotation in QImageReader.
- Keep TIFF rotation as it is (and change it to the Qt-wide default for Qt 6)
Anything else will cause us a lot of
On Thursday 23 April 2015, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 04/23/2015 04:53 AM, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > We already have a complete solution -
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/110685
>
> That looks good.
>
> > All we need now is to fix the behavioral regression introduced in 5.4.
>
> But if
René, maybe this helps you a bit:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/111056/
It's only a incomplete copy and paste of your Qt 4 patch,
but it could show you the direction.
Peter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
On 04/23/2015 04:53 AM, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> We already have a complete solution -
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/110685
That looks good.
> All we need now is to fix the behavioral regression introduced in 5.4.
But if I understand the code correctly, the fix above gives developers
an o
On Thursday April 23 2015 02:26:22 Jan Kundrát wrote:
Hi,
>what did the damn system say, and what command did you use to send your
>patch to that damn system?
I cannot answer that exactly, I was trying to do the push amidst the
preparations for a trip which I'm now on and which explains that t
22 matches
Mail list logo
