Re: [Development] JSON 64 bit int

2015-04-01 Thread Julien Blanc
On 12/02/2015 08:42, Knoll Lars wrote: > > Yes, 80 or 128bit doubles are out of the question. The RFC basically > doesn’t specify the range of allowed values, but hints that it should at > least support doubles. We can go above that and allow 64bit integers as > well as they are rather common these

[Development] QTreeWidgetItem clone

2015-04-01 Thread Baicai
Hi All, QTreeWidgetItem uses the copy constructor to implement its clone method. It does not copy item's type, but there isn't a setType method to modify it. So the clone method is a bit useless in this sense. Is there any reason not to copy the item's type? Or I'm not using it correctly Be

Re: [Development] Why is QTBUG-27186 closed?

2015-04-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:17:15 Matthew Woehlke wrote: > I'm getting a little sick of my users having problems because > QFileDialog::getSaveFileName does not add the extension. Can someone > please explain to me why this (apparently quite popular) bug is not only > *NOT* fixed after so long, b

[Development] Why is QTBUG-27186 closed?

2015-04-01 Thread Matthew Woehlke
I'm getting a little sick of my users having problems because QFileDialog::getSaveFileName does not add the extension. Can someone please explain to me why this (apparently quite popular) bug is not only *NOT* fixed after so long, but the bug claims it *is* fixed and has been closed? -- Matthew

Re: [Development] Outdated Branch Guidelines and Commit Policy?

2015-04-01 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2015-04-01 11:32, Thiago Macieira wrote: > 5.4 should receive important and non-risky bugfixes. Can I request that https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-43269 and https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-45328 be fixed in 5.4? At present, one must employ hackish work-arounds (in one case, using lo

Re: [Development] Outdated Branch Guidelines and Commit Policy?

2015-04-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 01 April 2015 12:55:02 Liang Qi wrote: > I have seen more and more bug fixes are going to 5.5 branch instead of 5.4. > And many reviewers prefer to do that. > > 5.4 is much more stable than 5.5, that's for sure, and I think the patches > for 5.4 are still valuable for customers and us

Re: [Development] [Interest] Et tu, Designer! Fwd: qt creator 3.3.x OS X with the xcb plugin

2015-04-01 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Tuesday March 31 2015 13:56:33 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I think it is caused by creating a QMenuBar explicitly, without specifying a > parent object. That eventually leads to the application icon appearing in the > Dock, too, so it would seem that Not exactly; Qt Creator presumed that if is

[Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 3.4 RC1 released

2015-04-01 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 3.4 RC1 http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/04/01/qt-creator-3-4-rc1-released/ -- Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - The Qt Company GmbH The Qt Company GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Ha

Re: [Development] Outdated Branch Guidelines and Commit Policy?

2015-04-01 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Liang Qi wrote: > https://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines > It's still in dev/stable mode, not the current 5.3/5.4/5.5/dev mode. > it's not. the markup actually means something. ___ Development mailing list Developm

[Development] Outdated Branch Guidelines and Commit Policy?

2015-04-01 Thread Liang Qi
https://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines It's still in dev/stable mode, not the current 5.3/5.4/5.5/dev mode. https://wiki.qt.io/Commit_Policy Make sure to follow the Branch Guidelines. Submit against the lowest applicable branch from which a release is still planned. I have seen more and more bug fi