Re: [Development] Removing the -c++11 option from configure

2015-03-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Saturday 21 March 2015 18:55:52 Edward Sutton wrote: > When cross-compiling Qt for embedded use, are C++11 compilers always > available? Yes, of course. Embedded targets use GCC too. But that's not relevant to this discussion. > Personally I have avoided using latest C++11 in my Qt applicati

Re: [Development] Changes to continuous integration in qtdeclarative/dev

2015-03-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 19 March 2015 13:16:43 Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > If you run into trouble or see suspicious behavior, talk to Simon, Lars and > me, we'll all be keeping an eye on things running smoothly. Great job guys! -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel

Re: [Development] Removing the -c++11 option from configure

2015-03-21 Thread Edward Sutton
When cross-compiling Qt for embedded use, are C++11 compilers always available? Personally I have avoided using latest C++11 in my Qt applications. My concern is that I will need to port a Qt app to an embedded platform that only has no C++11 compilers. Or perhaps an old Linux distribution su

[Development] Removing the -c++11 option from configure

2015-03-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
We'd like to make Qt build unconditionally with the latest version of the C++ standard that is supported by the compiler. That implies removing the -c++11 option so that the -no-c++11 option goes away too. Possible drawbacks: - Inability to test non-C++11 codepaths in the CI => We can add a