On Thursday 19 March 2015 21:13:42 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> > Removing the files will not make the repository smaller. The actual
> > checkout size for most people will also be the same, since we're not
> > proposing removing from Qt, just moving around.
>
> Several years ago I started writing a gi
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 19:30:40 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>> I didn't say we *should* do it. Simply asking for opinions.
>>
>> There is no any single .ico file in qtbase (except of ones in
>> qicoimageformat auto-test) and we don't support -no
On Thursday 19 March 2015 19:30:40 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> I didn't say we *should* do it. Simply asking for opinions.
>
> There is no any single .ico file in qtbase (except of ones in
> qicoimageformat auto-test) and we don't support -no-ico/-qt-ico/-plugin-ico
> configure options, which makes i
2015-03-19 18:23 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 15:05:38 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > 2015-03-19 8:42 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> > > On Thursday 19 March 2015 04:54:09 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > > Hi guys.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about moving gif and ico plugi
On Thursday 19 March 2015 15:05:38 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> 2015-03-19 8:42 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> > On Thursday 19 March 2015 04:54:09 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > Hi guys.
> > >
> > > What do you think about moving gif and ico plugins from qtbase
> > > to qtimageformats?
> >
> > Why? Wha
Hi all,
I'd like to give everyone a heads up (of hopefully good news). We plan to
switch over the dev branch of qtdeclarative to a new continuous integration
system in the beginning of next week. We currently aim for Monday if all goes
well.
There will be a more comprehensive blog post about t
2015-03-19 8:42 GMT+04:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 04:54:09 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > What do you think about moving gif and ico plugins from qtbase
> > to qtimageformats?
>
> Why? What's the reason?
>
Well, we have a separate module for non-mandatory image
For me this test fails with 5.4 and passes with 5.5, so something was fixed :)
(the test code is the same, of course).
Best regards,
Timur.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Albert Astals Cid
S
Hi.
I'll have a look.
Best regards,
Timur.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Albert Astals Cid
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:53 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] [Mac]
It seems tst_qquickwindow::testWindowVisibilityOrder() has regressed
in the 5.4 branch (either because of qtdeclarative or qtbase changes)
and is not letting changes to the branch integrate.
I've run it locally here (linux) and get no failure, so it may be Mac
specific since it always seem to fail
Not currently. It just doesn't work in the current CI system. But we're
currently working on a new and much improved CI system (more info soon in a
separate mail), that should at least improve the long integration times.
Cheers,
Lars
On 19/03/15 04:10, "Konstantin Ritt"
mailto:ritt...@gmail.co
11 matches
Mail list logo
