> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
> project.org [mailto:development-
> bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Denis Shienkov
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:10 PM
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: R
Hi all,
i have a question according license compatibilty.
In qtbase\src\corelib\tools\qdatetime.cpp above line 601 in qt5.4.1 i found this:
\legalese
Copyright (c) 1989 The Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary f
On Thursday 26 February 2015 21:05:31 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> even assuming that nobody else had an interest in this, you'd still need
> rather good reasons to effectively sabotage another contributor's
> interest, especially considering the majority situation.
I do have good reasons. See the
On Thursday 26 February 2015 20:54:32 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Let me put it this way: who's going to write the unit tests to ensure we
> > get coverage for all those conditionals? Any volunteers?
>
> which conditionals? the malloc wrapper would throw/qFatal (depending on
> the build configur
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2015 20:16:43 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > There's no feature on Linux to do that. Overcommit is always enabled.
> >
> > wrong.
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting
>
> H
> Does pushing over https work?
Seems, not. I can not get the "message hooks" via HTTP:
[denis@pclab qtserialport]$ scp -P 443
@codereview.qt-project.org:hooks/commit-msg
.git/hooks
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
But I can does "clone" and "push" (with an errors a
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:25:42AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20:07:58 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > as ulf pointed out, a rather trivial wrapper which ensures deterministic
> > behavior is hardly a burden.
>
> And I disagree that it's hardly a burden. I am sayin
On 26 February 2015 at 20:42, Denis Shienkov wrote:
>
> Though, here
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Setting-up-Gerrit#e948ac2dda3846bfff303f89c1ad266f
> in "Pushing your local changes to gerrit" I found out other way:
>
> $git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/5.4
I've just reread your first mail -- if SSH
> For 3) keep using the codereview server as usual.
But it is hangs on my side. So, I can not doing contribution anymore.. :)
Though, here
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Setting-up-Gerrit#e948ac2dda3846bfff303f89c1ad266f
in "Pushing your local changes to gerrit" I found out other way:
$git push ge
On 26 February 2015 at 20:31, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> Hmm.. I little confused.. I always used the "codereview.qt-project.org "
> server..
>
> But, how then I can to push my changes on codereview from the mirrors?
> I do not understand a base idea. Is there are any instructions?
There's a differen
> Always clone from the anonymous mirrors.
Hmm.. I little confused.. I always used the "codereview.qt-project.org "
server..
But, how then I can to push my changes on codereview from the mirrors?
I do not understand a base idea. Is there are any instructions?
26.02.2015 22:21, Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 26 February 2015 20:16:43 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > There's no feature on Linux to do that. Overcommit is always enabled.
>
> wrong.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting
Have you read the file you linked to?
Options are:
0 Heuristic overcommit
On Thursday 26 February 2015 22:00:21 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > Don't clone from the Gerrit server. Clone from Gitorious, GitHub or
>
> one of the other mirrors.
>
> Hmm? I'm sorry, but what about this instructions:
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Gerrit-Introduction ?
> This is deprecated now?
It
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:27:05AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20:09:21 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:38:21AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:20:54 Christian Kandeler wrote:
> > > > Also, you are not e
> Don't clone from the Gerrit server. Clone from Gitorious, GitHub or
one of the other mirrors.
Hmm? I'm sorry, but what about this instructions:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Gerrit-Introduction ?
This is deprecated now?
26.02.2015 21:19, Thiago Macieira пишет:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20
Hiho,
I am looking for a way to fetch some resources from WebCore sources
(QtWebKit) with QNAM. I want it to be associated with user-agent of
QWebView and referrer of QWebPage. Is there a way to handle this?
Thanks!
___
Development mailing list
Developm
On Thursday 26 February 2015 15:05:58 Kojo Tero wrote:
> and the content has been migrated from the old wiki.
Which of the two old wikis? Both http://wiki.qt-project.org and
http://qt-project.org/wiki?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source T
On Thursday 26 February 2015 19:22:56 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> When using such a large library as Qt is quite hard to get along with
> disabled overcommit on embedded device (because you need to keep your
> application's VmSize under than size of physical memory).
That's not necessary.
Let me
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 21:29:31 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > -- why should now people have a slower library because
> > of all those checks?
>
> Q_CHECK_PTR does not necessarily make the library slower. It only needs to
> be applied to malloc/calloc and nothrow operator new, because ordinary new
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20:09:21 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:38:21AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:20:54 Christian Kandeler wrote:
> > > Also, you are not even guaranteed to get a null pointer/bad_alloc due to
> > > things like L
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20:07:58 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:01:54AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:48:44 Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > > >> We should thus do Q_CHECK_PTR on every memory allocation in Qt and we
> > > >> should fix Q_CHEC
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 20:24:40 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Currently I can not clone any of repo using the "git clone" command,
> this attempt hangs forever on my ArchLinux:
That's expected. Don't clone from the Gerrit server. Clone from Gitorious,
GitHub or one of the other mirr
Yes, that does look nicer.
Can you open a bug for me on bugreports.qt.io on that? Otherwise I will forget.
Tero
From: Taylor Braun-Jones [mailto:tay...@braun-jones.org]
Sent: 26. helmikuuta 2015 18:26
To: Kojo Tero
Cc: Qt Project; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt Wiki
25.02.2015, 22:09, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:38:21AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:20:54 Christian Kandeler wrote:
>>> Also, you are not even guaranteed to get a null pointer/bad_alloc due to
>>> things like Linux overcommitting.
>>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Kojo Tero
wrote:
> In short, it’s a mediawiki instance, you use Qt Account to log in for
> editing,
>
>
Would it make sense to turn the "Enable enhanced editing toolbar" option on
by default for new accounts? Seems to me like it would be the preferred
option for
Hello,
We just opened the new Qt Wiki at http://wiki.qt.io
You can find the details in the blog post:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/02/26/new-qt-wiki-now-available/
In short, it's a mediawiki instance, you use Qt Account to log in for editing,
and the content has been migrated from the old wiki.
A
All should be OK now!
Note that logs are now located in the new host testresults.qt.io/ci
The status page as well is now there: testresults.qt.io/ci/status
And QtMetrics http://testresults.qt.io/qtmetrics
Regards,
-Tony
From: Sarajärvi Tony
Sent: 26. helmikuuta 2015 15:20
To: development@qt-proj
Hi
Terribly sorry for the late notice, but even I wasn't aware of the tight
schedule before yesterday.
Testresults.qt-project.org will be powered off during the weekend. The content
has been transferred over to testresults.qt.io already and it will host the
services (CI status, QtMetrics and l
How is that different from linking a custom implementation of operator
new/operator delete and malloc/free into Qt?
These are embedded use-cases anyway, so you wouldn’t be using a stock Qt
binary. Implementing the above is well-documented, and in fact both C++11 and
C++14 have improved the way
29 matches
Mail list logo
