On Sunday 22 February 2015 05:47:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> > That would mean you would also deprecate QNX 6.5.0, 6.6.0 (which is a
> > relatively new release), and BlackBerries. I personally would have loved
> > to remove support for 6.5.0, since it is based on an old gcc ve
Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> That would mean you would also deprecate QNX 6.5.0, 6.6.0 (which is a
> relatively new release), and BlackBerries. I personally would have loved
> to remove support for 6.5.0, since it is based on an old gcc version that
> can barely keep up with latest C++ developments (an
On 21 February 2015 at 18:38, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> 2015-02-21 22:05 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
>
>>
>> On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
>>>
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
fr
I've been trying to for ages, I'd like to get the support for OCSP and
OCSP stapling implemented.
* If possible, I'd like to get the rework of the ssl errors API discussed
at last years QtCS implemented.
Cheers
Rich.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment w
On Saturday 21 February 2015 22:38:03 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> The SecureTransport backend has been already introduced - that's a feature,
> a dep. library version bump is not
Major behaviour change.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Tech
On Saturday 21 February 2015 18:06:47 Richard Moore wrote:
> On 21 February 2015 at 17:54, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > On 21 February 2015 at 18:30, Richard Moore wrote:
> > > Openssl 0.9.8 will reach EOL in December anyway. In addition to removing
> >
> > the
> >
> > > support from the source
2015-02-21 22:05 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
>
> On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>
>> 2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
>>
>>> Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
>>> frame:
>>>
>>> * Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
>>>
>>>
On Saturday 21 February 2015 09:06:13 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Friday 20 February 2015 08:02:50 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2015 09:49:57 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > I already have added Q_DECL_OVERRIDE to all the examples in
> > > qtbase/examples. The examples are currently co
On Saturday 21 February 2015 09:11:57 Sean Harmer wrote:
> The best approach is likely to be for us to work with QNX to point out
> where their dinkumware libcpp has problems with specific examples, as we
> are doing regarding the recent constexpr support issue. I'm sure QNX will
> be happy to get
On Saturday 21 February 2015 10:46:41 Sebastian Lehmann wrote:
> Its implementation follows straight out of how Q_FOREACH is implemented,
> just adding another for-loop. I only implemented the GCC version back
> then, though.
Hi Sebastian
I "upgraded" Q_FOREACH for 5.4 to make it more readable
On 21 February 2015 at 17:54, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 21 February 2015 at 18:30, Richard Moore wrote:
> > Openssl 0.9.8 will reach EOL in December anyway. In addition to removing
> the
> > support from the sources, I suspect this will involve some changes to how
> > the library is searched
On 21 February 2015 at 17:34, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> 2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
>
>> Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
>> frame:
>>
>> * Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
>>
>> This has been unsupported for a while and was really only
On 21 February 2015 at 18:30, Richard Moore wrote:
> Openssl 0.9.8 will reach EOL in December anyway. In addition to removing the
> support from the sources, I suspect this will involve some changes to how
> the library is searched for when we use dlopen.
As well as 1.0.0. Should we make Qt 5.6 r
2015-02-21 21:30 GMT+04:00 Richard Moore :
> Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
> frame:
>
> * Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
>
> This has been unsupported for a while and was really only retained since
> it is the only version apple ship on OS X (tho
Here's an outline of stuff I'd like to see get done in the Qt 5.6 time
frame:
* Complete removal of openssl 0.9.8 support
This has been unsupported for a while and was really only retained since it
is the only version apple ship on OS X (though they don't actually
recommend using it). Qt 5.5 intr
Done on:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/105971/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/105992/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/105994/
@Ossi, since downmerge happens on Monday, is it safe to assume this will land
on 5.5?
Thanks,
Rafael
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:55:05PM -
Just want to throw in my "foreach key/value" loop implementation, as an
extension of "foreach", which I did years ago just as a proof of
concept.
http://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/11681/
It allows you to do:
foreachkv(auto key, auto value, map) {
// do sth with key /
Done.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-44595
Have a good weekend!
On 20 February 2015 at 13:22, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:07:07PM +0200, William Hallatt wrote:
> > On 20 February 2015 at 11:58, Oswald Buddenhagen <
> oswal
On Friday 20 February 2015 14:09:09 Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2015 16:44:28 Cristian Adam wrote:
> > > There is another option for QNX, use libstdc++ from GCC and not libcpp
> > > from
> > > Dinkumware.
> > >
On Friday 20 February 2015 08:02:50 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday 20 February 2015 09:49:57 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > I already have added Q_DECL_OVERRIDE to all the examples in
> > qtbase/examples. The examples are currently compiled as part of CI, but
> > maybe we should start using lambda
20 matches
Mail list logo
