[Development] Failed assertion in QSGBatchRenderer::ShaderManager::prepareMaterial()

2015-02-16 Thread Bojan Petrović
Hi, I am using Qt 5.4 on Windows. I have encountered a failed assertion in QSGBatchRenderer::ShaderManager::prepareMaterial(QSGMaterial * material), line 158 C++. It happens when I start my application, but not every time. This is the message I got in the console: uniform highp float _qt_zRange;

Re: [Development] Proposed syntax change for pragmas and imports in QtQuick .js files

2015-02-16 Thread Chris Adams
Hi, On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Mike Verdone wrote: > Hi all, > > This is my first post to the Qt dev list. Apologies if I say something > dumb. > > I’d like to propose some changes to the “meta” syntax in QtQuick .js > files. I propose this in order to support JavaScript tools such as lin

Re: [Development] QtRemoteObjects - POD types derive from QObject

2015-02-16 Thread Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
On Monday, February 16, 2015 1:25 PM Roland Winklmeier wrote: >a while ago the QtRemoteObjects project was started in the playground >area. I >had followed the discussions closely, because I'm running a project >which has a >perfect use case for QtRemoteObjects. I haven't had much time to look >in

Re: [Development] Does QNetworkAccessManager could provide the Server Sent Event feature ?

2015-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 16 February 2015 23:52:19 Paul Chavent wrote: > The parts 6 "Parsing an event stream" [2] gives the specs of the format over > http. The part 7 "Interpreting an event stream" explains how it should be > handled by the client. For some sample code, I've found useful those two > pages [3] a

Re: [Development] Does QNetworkAccessManager could provide the Server Sent Event feature ?

2015-02-16 Thread Paul Chavent
On 02/16/2015 10:44 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 16 February 2015 21:52:13 Paul Chavent wrote: >> Hi Qt dev list. >> >> I would like to ask you if there are any plans for providing Server Sent >> Event [1] signals in the QNetworkAccessManager. >> >> The Server Sent Event (SSE) can be used

Re: [Development] Does QNetworkAccessManager could provide the Server Sent Event feature ?

2015-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 16 February 2015 21:52:13 Paul Chavent wrote: > Hi Qt dev list. > > I would like to ask you if there are any plans for providing Server Sent > Event [1] signals in the QNetworkAccessManager. > > The Server Sent Event (SSE) can be used by web pages that need asynchronous > updates from t

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Monday 16 February 2015 13:22:30 Rex Dieter wrote: > Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2015-02-16, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> * QT_BUILD_KEY handling > >> > >> Similar to webkit above, the configure bits about QT_BUILD_KEY only > >> handles up to gcc-4.x. > >> > >> For fedora 22, our gcc5 builds are don

[Development] Does QNetworkAccessManager could provide the Server Sent Event feature ?

2015-02-16 Thread Paul Chavent
Hi Qt dev list. I would like to ask you if there are any plans for providing Server Sent Event [1] signals in the QNetworkAccessManager. The Server Sent Event (SSE) can be used by web pages that need asynchronous updates from the server (a kind of server push mechanism). It is very lightweight

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2015-02-16, Rex Dieter wrote: >>From my reading of > http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora/ > > It may depend on the value of _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI macro, but I admittedly > don't yet fully grasp the implications of it being set either way. Yes. it does depend on lots of

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2015-02-16, Rex Dieter wrote: >> * QT_BUILD_KEY handling >> >> Similar to webkit above, the configure bits about QT_BUILD_KEY only >> handles up to gcc-4.x. >> >> For fedora 22, our gcc5 builds are done in a way that is (supposedly) ABI >> compatible to gcc4, so I'm curre

[Development] QtRemoteObjects - POD types derive from QObject

2015-02-16 Thread Roland Winklmeier
Dear list, a while ago the QtRemoteObjects project was started in the playground area. I had followed the discussions closely, because I'm running a project which has a perfect use case for QtRemoteObjects. I haven't had much time to look into the details yet, but now I did. In the absence of do

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2015-02-16, Rex Dieter wrote: > * QT_BUILD_KEY handling > > Similar to webkit above, the configure bits about QT_BUILD_KEY only handles > up to gcc-4.x. > > For fedora 22, our gcc5 builds are done in a way that is (supposedly) ABI > compatible to gcc4, so I'm currently using: > http://pkgs.fe

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Monday 16 February 2015 09:16:36 Rex Dieter wrote: [snip] > > OK, I'll cleanup and submit soon, who would you suggest I add as reviewers? I can't approve, but please add me as reviewer. -- Si vives cada día de tu vida como si fuera el último, algún día realmente tendrás razón. Steve Jobs

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 16 February 2015 08:55:14 Rex Dieter wrote: > * webkit components don't build, this is due to a configure check for > gcc-4.x, here's my quick-n-dirty fix (for g++ stanza only, others probably > should get touched too): > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt.git/tree/qt-fix_detectio

Re: [Development] Reproducible Qt ; the purpose of QLibraryInfo::buildDate

2015-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 16 February 2015 08:42:39 Alejandro Exojo wrote: > Not only that. I still think that you could have the reproducible builds > feature without introducing breakage: just fake the date. Hardcode the date > where you care about the issue, and not for everybody else. I see there is > someth

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:55:14 AM Rex Dieter wrote: >> Found a couple more gcc5-related issues with qt-4.8.x builds: >> >> * webkit components don't build, this is due to a configure check for ... >> * QT_BUILD_KEY handling .. >> Both of these are fairly simple/o

Re: [Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:55:14 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > Found a couple more gcc5-related issues with qt-4.8.x builds: > > * webkit components don't build, this is due to a configure check for > gcc-4.x, here's my quick-n-dirty fix (for g++ stanza only, others probably > should get touched too

[Development] qt-4.8.x gcc5 version/detection issues

2015-02-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Found a couple more gcc5-related issues with qt-4.8.x builds: * webkit components don't build, this is due to a configure check for gcc-4.x, here's my quick-n-dirty fix (for g++ stanza only, others probably should get touched too): http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt.git/tree/qt-fix_detection

Re: [Development] Proposed syntax change for pragmas and imports in QtQuick .js files

2015-02-16 Thread Hausmann Simon
Hi, In principle I think that's a very good direction. However .pragma singleton does not exist for .js files :). Qt.import as a substitute for .pragma import would be great. In an ideal world we'd support es6 modules. Simon Original Message From: Mike Verdone Sent: Monday, February 16, 201

[Development] Proposed syntax change for pragmas and imports in QtQuick .js files

2015-02-16 Thread Mike Verdone
Hi all, This is my first post to the Qt dev list. Apologies if I say something dumb. I’d like to propose some changes to the “meta” syntax in QtQuick .js files. I propose this in order to support JavaScript tools such as linters and “transpilers”. Specifically I’d like to change: .pragma singlet

[Development] HEADS UP: Qt5.5. branching started

2015-02-16 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, Qt5.5 feature freeze & branching period is now ongoing. '5.5' branch is created & you should start using it for the changes targeted to Qt5.5 release. Again we will use 'soft branching' scheme like we did with 5.4.0. Downmerge from 'dev' to '5.5' will happen next Monday (23rd Feb) so th

[Development] CI replaced Ubuntu 12.04 with 14.04 in dev branch

2015-02-16 Thread Sarajärvi Tony
Hi As planned earlier, we replaced Ubuntu 12.04 configurations with Ubuntu 14.04 configurations in dev branch just a few seconds ago. All 14.04 configuration should have forcesuccess and insignificant on to begin with, if we didn't miss anything. We will keep several eyes on the dev branch now

[Development] New Qt 4.8.7 snapshot build is available

2015-02-16 Thread Salovaara Akseli
Hi, New Qt 4.8.7 snapshot build is available http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/4.8/4.8.7/2015-02-16-4/ Snapshot is built against sha1 2b7758a8763a8fe6ca13a2f04e0137df79c849d2 Don't leak RENDER Pictures in QPixmap::paintEngine() (current HEAD). Changes compared to previous snapshot: http: