Thanks Ismo, Tony, Ossi and all the people behind the scenes to get things up
and running again!
Simon
From: Sarajärvi Tony
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 20:41
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] CI broken
I think I got everything up and running again. At least nothing
I think I got everything up and running again. At least nothing is complaining
currently.
Checking the status again in 11 hours when I get to work.
Regards,
-Tony
From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany...
On 27/01/2015 13:56, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:34:10AM +, Haataja Ismo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gerrit should be back online in new location.
>> We may need to do some fine tuning still so short breaks may happen.
>>
>> SSH key of the server changed also, new RSA key fin
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:34:10AM +, Haataja Ismo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gerrit should be back online in new location.
> We may need to do some fine tuning still so short breaks may happen.
>
> SSH key of the server changed also, new RSA key fingerprint is:
> de:05:7c:a8:10:0c:db:7e:5e:37:25:de:24
Hi
The CI will remain broken at least today. We have no idea why the RSA keys are
messed up on the servers even though we copy paste everything from a working
server. Investigations continue tomorrow...
-Tony
Tony Sarajärvi
CI Tech Lead
The Qt Company / Digia Finland Ltd, Elektroniikkatie 10,
Hi,
Gerrit should be back online in new location.
We may need to do some fine tuning still so short breaks may happen.
SSH key of the server changed also, new RSA key fingerprint is:
de:05:7c:a8:10:0c:db:7e:5e:37:25:de:24:3f:af:10
If you find any problems, please let us know as soon as possible!
On Tuesday 27 January 2015 09:27:36 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> We should move the tests to use qt.io certificate. We will eventually get
> qt-project.org certificate, but it is still better to use qt.io for the
> tests.
>
> For a short term solution, perhaps we could simply disable fail
Hi Tony,
I believe it would do it. Would it be possible, then? If so, great news :)
Thanks,
Rafael
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:08:29AM +, Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be enough if we added it only to the nightly 'state' builds? Having
> it in the general configurations would once
Hi Rich,
We should move the tests to use qt.io certificate. We will eventually get
qt-project.org certificate, but it is still better to use qt.io for the tests.
For a short term solution, perhaps we could simply disable failing SSL tests
and get them back when we have changed these for qt.io
2015-01-27 12:41 GMT+04:00 Chris Adams :
> Hi Renato,
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Renato Araujo wrote:
>
>> Hi Cris,
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Chris Adams > > wrote:
>>
>>> QContactType::TypeGroup is meant to represent a group of entities with
>>> shared contact detai
Hi Renato,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Renato Araujo wrote:
> Hi Cris,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Chris Adams
> wrote:
>
>> QContactType::TypeGroup is meant to represent a group of entities with
>> shared contact details (eg, a local football club might have a mailing-list
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
