Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 6 Jan 2015, at 01:06, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2015 23:15:24 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: >>> I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after >>> that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by defau

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.4.1 release coming

2015-01-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 08:58:48 manish sharma wrote: > Hi, > > Where can i find complete list of know issues in Qt5.4? > > I can see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt540-KnownIssues but looks like it > was last updated on 11 Dec. That's when 5.4.0 was released. Why would we update the list of kn

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.4.1 release coming

2015-01-05 Thread manish sharma
Hi, Where can i find complete list of know issues in Qt5.4? I can see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt540-KnownIssues but looks like it was last updated on 11 Dec. Regards, Manish On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Heikkinen Jani < jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Unfort

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 05 January 2015 23:15:24 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > > I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after > > that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by default. > > Can we make it opt-in instead of opt-out? I d

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Monday 05 January 2015 14:27:20 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2015 15:27:24 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > ACKing that I do not do developer-build for Debian (because "we don't need > > it" [0]) and that my opinion should not have much weight if any, I do > > al

[Development] libqsqlodbc.dylib has jumped the shark?

2015-01-05 Thread Henry Skoglund
Hi, just installed Qt 5.4 on OSX (with the online installer) noticed that libqsqlodbc.dylib isn't included in the plugins/sqldrivers folder anymore (it was there in 5.2 and 5.3). If this removal is by purpose, for example to fix QTBUG-37835, then I can fully understand the decision; using ODBC

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 05 January 2015 15:27:24 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > ACKing that I do not do developer-build for Debian (because "we don't need > it" [0]) and that my opinion should not have much weight if any, I do also > think Thiago's idea is a nice one. I do also consider having hea

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by default. Can we make it opt-in instead of opt-out? I don't see why all Qt developers should pay by default for the extra com

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2015-01-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 19:57:47 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello all > > I've previously mentioned this, but I can't find the link in the archives. > > I've implemented a better headersclean check that can't be forgotten. You > can find it at https://codereview.qt-project.org/45533 > > This

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

2015-01-05 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Cristian Adam > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 11:14 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Dev

Re: [Development] Why does QLabel::pixmap() return `const QPixmap*`?

2015-01-05 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 2 December 2014 at 07:37, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > On 1 December 2014 at 16:00, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On Monday 01 December 2014 07:40:50 Knoll Lars wrote: > >> Exactly that. It’s been like that since Qt 1 times, where QPixmap was a > >> non shared class you had to instantiate on the he

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

2015-01-05 Thread Cristian Adam
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Cristian Adam wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 > (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.0.exe) > and I've noticed that the Qt Creator bundled with it was compiled with > MSVC 2010 and had its > own version of Qt 5.4 MSVC 2010 DLLs (~100MB

[Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

2015-01-05 Thread Cristian Adam
Hi, I've installed Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.0.exe) and I've noticed that the Qt Creator bundled with it was compiled with MSVC 2010 and had its own version of Qt 5.4 MSVC 2010 DLLs (~100MB) What is the reason for this? Is Mingw-GCC 4.9.1 that bad, that a

Re: [Development] Start of a refactor of the QSettings class based on QJson

2015-01-05 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
On 02/10/14 22:36, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø > mailto:tor.arne.ves...@digia.com>> wrote: > > On 26/09/14 00:31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > >> since I need to take the value, modify it, insert it back nested > groups are > >> a pain to