Re: [Development] Need help to integrate a patch with MSVC2008 (wince)

2014-12-18 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Thursday 18 December 2014 09:34:19 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday 18 December 2014 14:56:05 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > I've got a patch that does not integrate because it fails in CI on > > MSVC2008 > > (wince) > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/98658/ > > > > Probably due to a co

Re: [Development] Need help to integrate a patch with MSVC2008 (wince)

2014-12-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 18 December 2014 14:56:05 Olivier Goffart wrote: > I've got a patch that does not integrate because it fails in CI on MSVC2008 > (wince) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/98658/ > > Probably due to a compiler bug, the problem seems to be that the proper > template partial speciali

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2014-12-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 18 December 2014 13:53:38 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 18/12/2014 04:57, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > > Drawback: > > It increases the build time considerably (25 to 33%) due to having a lot > > more files to compile, and always without PCH. > > Are those files part of the tests? I.e

[Development] [qmake] Why does it not allow a version of 0 for a library in findLibraries

2014-12-18 Thread Darin Broady
On Windows, I'm attempting to do the following:   LIBS += -lsomeLibwhere someLib exists in the /LIBPATH as someLib0.dll and someLib0.lib.  When I run qmake, it never finds someLib0.lib and always puts someLib.lib in the generated Makefile.  If the library is named someLib1.dll & someLib1.lib, th

[Development] Need help to integrate a patch with MSVC2008 (wince)

2014-12-18 Thread Olivier Goffart
I've got a patch that does not integrate because it fails in CI on MSVC2008 (wince) https://codereview.qt-project.org/98658/ Probably due to a compiler bug, the problem seems to be that the proper template partial specialization is not taken. I don't have access to this compiler so I don't know

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2014-12-18 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Il 18/12/2014 04:57, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: Drawback: It increases the build time considerably (25 to 33%) due to having a lot more files to compile, and always without PCH. Are those files part of the tests? I.e. -developer-build -nomake tests should not have any performance drawback?

Re: [Development] A better headersclean test

2014-12-18 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 19:57:47 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello all > > I've previously mentioned this, but I can't find the link in the archives. > > I've implemented a better headersclean check that can't be forgotten. You > can find it at https://codereview.qt-project.org/45533 > > This

[Development] QtQuick not usable on Windows tablet computers? (Was: Virtual keyboard)

2014-12-18 Thread Helmut Mülner
It looks like QtQuick on Windows table computers is severly broken: Automatic popup of the virtual keyboard does not work. But it works with QWidgets and QML System Dialogs. I tried to hack around the issue by calling C++-Code to show/hide the keyboard (using FindWindow and PostMessage) in onActiv

Re: [Development] qmake vcxproj generator issue

2014-12-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 18 December 2014 09:09:31 raven-worx Software wrote: > In Qt 5.3.x: > > .) MSVC 2008 is missing the C9x headers (stdint.h) which are mandatory > to compile Webkit module. So i needed to provide them myself. Considering WebKit hasn't changed and has been compiling with MSVC 2008 since

Re: [Development] qmake vcxproj generator issue

2014-12-18 Thread raven-worx Software
>> i am using the command "qmake -tp vc -r" to generate Visual Studio projects. >> With Qt 5.3 and MSVC2008 this worked flawlessly. >> But since Qt 5.4 can't be compiled with MSVC2008 anymore i switched to >> MSVC2013. > > What do you mean by "Qt 5.4 can't be compiled with MSVC2008 anymore"? > Vis