Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I also recommend hardcoding the exception for enginio and removing the
> generic '-' solution to prevent such problems in the future.
Exception is needed for webkit too, of course.
Thanks,
Steve.
___
Development mailing list
De
Hello,
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtwebengine/commit/bef6cc644f176a69a85c68126bd0d7e50ab5757e
causes
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42073
because it disabled the tests (stupidly) instead of disabling the generation
of cmake files. The commit message also conveys lack of u
El Tuesday 09 December 2014, Dmitry Volosnykh escribió:
> Hi!
>
> "What's New in Qt 5" documentation article
> (http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/qt5-intro.html) under
> "Designing UI Made Simpler" section introduces Qt Quick Controls and
> Qt Quick Layouts modules at once. As far as I can see there
On 09 Dec 2014, at 17:37, Frank Osterfeld wrote:
>
> (I’ll also test with the linked tarball, but that will take a couple more
> hours)
The rebuild using your official tar.xz tarball went through without issue.
>
> On 08 Dec 2014, at 08:58, Heikkinen Jani
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We
On Sunday 7. December 2014 22.11.04 Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Chris Adams
>
> wrote:
> > Sure. I think there are advantages to be had from bundling, obviously,
> > but those don't really exist right now. +1 from me.
>
> I'm of the same opinion. Can't defend keeping i
Hi!
"What's New in Qt 5" documentation article
(http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/qt5-intro.html) under
"Designing UI Made Simpler" section introduces Qt Quick Controls and
Qt Quick Layouts modules at once. As far as I can see there is no
clear evidence that Layouts may be used separately from Contro
And I’ve now updated the wiki with all the new maintainers that got
nominated and accepted over the last couple of months.
Congratulations to all of them :)
Cheers,
Lars
On 08/12/14 09:22, "Paul Olav Tvete" wrote:
>On Friday 5. December 2014 10.56.48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Was there anyone
> Just do the check I did above: What is the day before 0001-01-01?
It's more complicated than that. Apparently certain date formats represent
something called "333 BC" in human language as "-332". See QTBUG-29491 for some
discussion.
--
Ulf Hermann, Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia G
