Re: [Development] The dark side of QtMultimedia

2014-11-15 Thread Nichols Andy
Hi Kevin and others, I still think that this discussion has derailed. I do not think Phonon is the solution to fix or replace QtMultimedia so I hope to make this clear so we can move on to a real solution. The current state of Phonon is thus: Phonon is part of the KDE project and is licensed

[Development] Phonon + QML Qt Quick 2 possible ?

2014-11-15 Thread Gianluca
Dear all, there is a long discussion “the dark side of QtMultimedia” and the question of this email comes from that discussion. Some suggested to try using Phonon instead of QtMultimedia, and so let’s suppose I want to try Phonon and my constraints are: Qt 5 and Qt Quick 2 What are my chances to

Re: [Development] The dark side of QtMultimedia

2014-11-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Massimo Callegari wrote: > Hello again,I'm glad that the topic I raised is somehow of interest, but I > noticed that, as usually good technicians do, you guys went straight into > techy bits, forgetting what the original post spotted. Because the "techy bits" are the (essential) first part of solv

Re: [Development] The dark side of QtMultimedia

2014-11-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > The issue is that neither GStreamer nor Phonon verified its' > assumptions. This means if something goes wrong... you will > debug for a long time (abstractions for an abstraction, etc). > At the same time "gst-launch playbin(2) .." just worked. FYI, current ver