- Original Message -
From: Simon Hausmann
To: BogDan
Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other
objects
On Monday, September 22, 2014 02:28:06 AM BogDan wrote:
> ---
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 07:02:32 PM Nils Jeisecke wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While porting to Qt5 I've stumbled over a very strange problem.
>
> QVariantMap objects mutate when transported from C++ via Qml back to C++.
>
> QVariant as constructed on the C++ side:
> QVariant(QVariantMap, QMap(("x"
On Monday, September 22, 2014 02:28:06 AM BogDan wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Simon Hausmann
> To: BogDan
> Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the
> other objects
Problems with MinGW build?
On 24 September 2014 19:53, Heikkinen Jani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First Qt5.4 beta snapshot packages available here
>
> Windows:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_20/
> Linux:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-b
5.4 beta is coming, how fast!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Heikkinen Jani
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First Qt5.4 beta snapshot packages available here
>
> Windows:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_20/
> Linux:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4
On 2014-09-24, at 07:53 AM, Heikkinen Jani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First Qt5.4 beta snapshot packages available here
>
> Windows:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_20/
> Linux:
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_24/
>
Hi!
While porting to Qt5 I've stumbled over a very strange problem.
QVariantMap objects mutate when transported from C++ via Qml back to C++.
QVariant as constructed on the C++ side:
QVariant(QVariantMap, QMap(("x", QVariant(QStringList, ("a", "b")) ) ) )
QVariant when gone through Qml and hand
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 08:15:45 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 20:08:28 Lorn Potter wrote:
> > > you have to retrieve the index() from the network interface first. It
> > > feels like a very procedural API.
> >
> > Yes, it is tedious and a bit odd to me, and
On Wednesday 24 September 2014 20:08:28 Lorn Potter wrote:
> > you have to retrieve the index() from the network interface first. It
> > feels like a very procedural API.
>
> Yes, it is tedious and a bit odd to me, and is one thing I do not like about
> it. A lot of those don't have anything to
Sorvig Morten digia.com> writes:
>
>
> > On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:03, Sorvig Morten digia.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 19 Sep 2014, at 11:28, Sorvig Morten digia.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >> This will indeed receive attention in the coming days. There are
already some patches attached to the
> QTBUGs
On 24 September 2014 11:34, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-09-24, Yam Marcovic wrote:
>> However, I will say I don't want to force people to give their sources away
>> if they use it.
>>
>> So a license along the lines of 'this license is here for formal purposes;
>> but feel free to do anything y
Hi all,
First Qt5.4 beta snapshot packages available here
Windows:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_20/
Linux:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-beta/2014-09-24_24/
Unfortunately there is still issues with mac packages & so on those ar
On 24 Sep 2014, at 3:57 pm, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> I wonder if the"int interface" indexed API is tedious to use. Say you do
> manage to get a QNetworkInterface object from QtNetwork, then before you can
> call for example
>
>QString imsi(int interface) const;
>
> you have to retrieve
On 2014-09-24, Yam Marcovic wrote:
> However, I will say I don't want to force people to give their sources away
> if they use it.
>
> So a license along the lines of 'this license is here for formal purposes;
> but feel free to do anything you want with this,' is good enough as far as
> I'm conce
> >From a 1 feet Qt as a product point of view, it's not evident why this
> >API
> belongs into a separate module instead of simply into the Qt network module.
That's a historical reason and Qt's inability to accept such a contribution at
the time when such changes were needed. This doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> On Behalf Of Kate Alhola
> The map component for QtQuick2 is part or qtlocation sources but to
> be enabled it requires to fetch qt3d from git, compile and install and then
> compiling qtlocatio
I don't care so much about that. I just think it'd be nice as part of the
Qt core library. So I'm open for suggestions. :)
However, I will say I don't want to force people to give their sources away
if they use it.
So a license along the lines of 'this license is here for formal purposes;
but fee
17 matches
Mail list logo
