On 2014-09-22, at 06:33 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>> qmake - framework bundle hierarchy (QTBUG-32895):
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95454
>> qmake - “_debug" in CFBundleExecutable (QTBUG-32894):
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95455
>> qmake - add CFBundleVersion: https://coderev
On 2014-09-22, at 05:56 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>>
>> And the Info.plist should *always* set CFBundleExecutable to QtCore. To use
>> the debug version you set the DYLD_IMAGE_SUFFIX environment variable to
>> _debug prior to execution.
>
> A minor case: What would you do for debug-only builds
On 19/09/2014 10:37 PM, BogDan wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted *before*
> the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the active
> objects may still need to access the singletons in their destructor ...
>
> IMHO
> qmake - framework bundle hierarchy (QTBUG-32895):
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95454
> qmake - “_debug" in CFBundleExecutable (QTBUG-32894):
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/95455
> qmake - add CFBundleVersion: https://codereview.qt-project.org/95456
> macdeployqt - “Current” version
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 11:28, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>
> This will indeed receive attention in the coming days. There are already some
> patches attached to the QTBUGs. I’ll post back here once we have a complete
> patch set ready. Target branches are Qt 5.3 and Qt 4.8.
I’m using QTBUG-32896 as a
>
> And the Info.plist should *always* set CFBundleExecutable to QtCore. To use
> the debug version you set the DYLD_IMAGE_SUFFIX environment variable to
> _debug prior to execution.
A minor case: What would you do for debug-only builds?
>
> As far as I'm aware, we already do this correctly (
- Original Message -
From: Simon Hausmann
To: BogDan
Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other
objects
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.33.14 BogDan wrote:
> On Mo
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.33.14 BogDan wrote:
> On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> > branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> > fixed it. The same problem is i
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> fixed it. The same problem is in previous releases.
>
> So, the singletons are deleted in QQ
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> fixed it. The same problem is in previous releases.
>
> So, the singletons are deleted in QQml
Hi Simon,
I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
fixed it. The same problem is in previous releases.
So, the singletons are deleted in QQmlEngine::~QQmlEngine():910
The other active objects are deleted in
Den 16 Sep 2014 kl. 9:31 AM skrev Reinio Topi:
I'd like to nominate Venugopal Shivashankar and Nico Vertriest as approvers in
the Qt Project. They are both documentation engineers and integral part of
the of Qt documentation team.
Venugopal Shivashankar:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/own
12 matches
Mail list logo
