Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb

RIP qtjsondb, takk for ingenting On Sep 19, 2014 1:58 PM, "Robin Burchell" wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy wrote: > > It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as > qt.gitorious.org that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its > current URL is not what I would

Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy wrote: > It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org > that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I > would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a > qt-abandon

Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb

On 5September2014, at 21:57, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2014 21:46:27 Jeremy wrote: >> I don’t see an issue with removing it from Qt 5. Is there a general plan for >> modules that exit from production-ready status? > > Modules that exit from production-ready status need t

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

> As far as I'm aware, we already do this correctly (aside from Info.plist > being in the wrong place), and the only reason _debug is showing up in an > Info.plist somewhere is probably due to some simple typo or omission. You're right, thanks. --Adam ___

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

On 2014-09-19, at 11:27 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >> codesigning complaining on this _debug reference >> CFBundleExecutable >> QtPrintSupport_debug > > Shouldn't be debug another version within multiversioned bundle? E.g.: > > QtCore -> Versions/Current/QtCore > Resources

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

> codesigning complaining on this _debug reference > CFBundleExecutable > QtPrintSupport_debug Shouldn't be debug another version within multiversioned bundle? E.g.: QtCore -> Versions/Current/QtCore Resources -> Versions/Current/Resources Versions/

Re: [Development] New company name for Qt part of Digia and unified web site

I enjoy the new look and the fluidity of the site. It conveys a sense of what developers can achieve graphically with the technology available in the Qt framework. One thing I feel that could be improved is http://www.qt.io/product/ -- it gives me the impression that Qt is a commercial-only produc

Re: [Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approver

+1 Cheers, Laszlo From: Sean Harmer Sent: ‎9/‎19/‎2014 12:58 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approver On Friday 19 September 2014 10:31:51 Fr

[Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other objects

Hello folks, Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted *before* the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the active objects may still need to access the singletons in their destructor ... IMHO singletons should be the very last objects deleted

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

Another issue with qt binaries cat ~/Qt/5.3/clang_64/lib/QtPrintSupport.framework/Contents/Info.plist http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd";> CFBundlePackageType FMWK CFBundleShortVersionString 5.3 CFBundleGetInfoString Created by Qt/QM

Re: [Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approver

On Friday 19 September 2014 10:31:51 Friedemann Kleint wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to nominate Louai Al-Khanji as approver inthe Qt Project: +1 Cheers, Sean -- Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | Managing Director UK Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

For anyone who is using CMake to build DMG packages using Qt, we have a script to fix up the layout of Qt repos prior to building at https://github.com/Mendeley/Mac-OS-X-Bundle-Utilities This was targeted at Qt 4 but the Qt 5 bundles have the same structure and issues as far as I see. On 19 Septe

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

> On 18 Sep 2014, at 22:07, Adam Strzelecki wrote: > >> Reported already 24/Jan/14 QTBUG-36429 > > FYI more recent and prioritized bug report is QTBUG-38511 > > I think it deserves a lot of attention now since 10.9.5 is live. This will indeed receive attention in the coming days. There are al

Re: [Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >> Reported already 24/Jan/14 QTBUG-36429 > > FYI more recent and prioritized bug report is QTBUG-38511 > > I think it deserves a lot of attention now since 10.9.5 is live. > > --Adam Agree. The v2 signatures will be enforced starting from

Re: [Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approver

> From: development-bounces+andrew.knight=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+andrew.knight=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf > Of Friedemann Kleint > Sent: 19 September 2014 11:32 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approve

[Development] Nominating Louai Al-Khanji as approver

Hi, I'd like to nominate Louai Al-Khanji as approver inthe Qt Project: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:louai.al-khanji,n,z https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/reviewer:louai.al-khanji,n,z He implemented the Windows Direct2D platform plugin (which works well beyond expectations) a

Re: [Development] New company name for Qt part of Digia and unified web site

> Your sentence is correct as long as the user *ships* qt libs alongside his > apps! If the application uses system libraries, then IMHO, is not his > responsibility to provide the sources for Qt. Right. And when using Ministro, it's the Ministro packager's responsibility to provide the sources