On 10 September 2014 21:15, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:24:58 Валерий Котов wrote:
> > I realize that we had this discussion before. But I have to ask. =)
> > Does not it make sense to add method and type in Operations enum for
> > options in case we need some special
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 10:03:48 haithem rahmani wrote:
> So I’m wondering whether the QtWebEngine will be functional or not for
> embedded platforms in the qt-4.5.0, added to that will it
> be working with DirectFB QPA/plugin?
It's unlikely it will work with DirectFB for now.
--
Thiago Ma
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 18:24:58 Валерий Котов wrote:
> I realize that we had this discussion before. But I have to ask. =)
> Does not it make sense to add method and type in Operations enum for
> options in case we need some special treatment for "OPTIONS" verb?
Only if we have a method for
Hi all,
Using qdoc from Qt 5.4.0 Alpha1, I generated documentation from the
"v5.4.0-alpha1" and "v5.3.1" git tags. Then, I diff'ed the qdoc outputs
using QDocErrorTracker [1].
Below is a list of errors that are new in Qt 5.4.0 Alpha1. Could those with
knowledge of the relevant areas please fix th
Could someone help review this patch in Gerrit. I think it only needs
another +1
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/94115/
Would be great to get that into Qt 5.3.2 which is due in about 6 days...
Thanks!
Conny
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:33 +0200, Cornelius Hald wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a Wi
Hi,
Qt 5.4 Alpha release is finally out, see
> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/09/08/qt-5-4-alpha-available/
>
> Alpha is source code delivery only. The plan forward is now to create a
> beta (including binary packages) during the next few weeks, see Qt 5.4
> schedule from http://qt-project.or
