On 03 Sep 2014, at 22:20, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:54:14 Saikrishna Arcot wrote:
>>> I should have mentioned that these libraries are using Qt 4, and it would be
>>> non-trivial to change them to Qt 5 jus
On Thursday 04 September 2014 05:24:38 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> It doesn't necessarily occur to an English speaker to identify translatable
> strings and wrap them in tr(), either. It is some work already to try to
> support localization, so we are talking about people who are aware enough
> to thi
Den 3 Sep 2014 kl. 6:11 PM skrev Thiago Macieira:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:16:22 Saether Jan-Arve wrote:
>> We could do that, but I don't see the problem in providing the translation
>> file. Shawn already mentioned many good reasons for why translating the
>> "engineering English" to
On 2014-09-03, at 07:58 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Could someone either fix it or disable iOS builds in the CI for 5.3?
>
>
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang
>
> -c -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fpascal-strings -fmessage-length=0 -W
Could someone either fix it or disable iOS builds in the CI for 5.3?
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang
-c -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fpascal-strings -fmessage-length=0 -Wno-
trigraphs -Wreturn-type -Wparentheses -Wswitch -Wno-unused-p
On Wednesday 03 September 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:54:14 Saikrishna Arcot wrote:
> > I should have mentioned that these libraries are using Qt 4, and it would be
> > non-trivial to change them to Qt 5 just for compilation purposes.
> >
> > I wasn't aware tha
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:31:04 Валерий Котов wrote:
> > Actually, I'm going back on what I had said. I think we can do
> > sendCustomRequest for both types of requests. The difference would be that
> > http://example.com sends OPTIONS * to example.com, but http://example.com/
> > sends OPT
2014-09-03 20:10 GMT+03:00 Thiago Macieira :
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:05:20 Валерий Котов wrote:
> >Greetings everybody!
>>
>> I'm working on QTBUG-35892 (
> >https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35892) feature request:
> >adding support for HTTP OPTIONS method for QML XmlHttpReq
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:05:20 Валерий Котов wrote:
> Greetings everybody!
>
> I'm working on QTBUG-35892 (
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35892) feature request:
> adding support for HTTP OPTIONS method for QML XmlHttpRequest class.
>
> >From discussion with Richard Mo
Greetings everybody!
I'm working on QTBUG-35892 (
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35892) feature request:
adding support for HTTP OPTIONS method for QML XmlHttpRequest class.
>From discussion with Richard Moore and Thiago Macieira I understood that 2
methods should be added to QNetw
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:54:14 Saikrishna Arcot wrote:
> I should have mentioned that these libraries are using Qt 4, and it would be
> non-trivial to change them to Qt 5 just for compilation purposes.
>
> I wasn't aware that doubles weren't supported on GLES. Based on that, and
> rereadi
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 07:16:22 Saether Jan-Arve wrote:
> We could do that, but I don't see the problem in providing the translation
> file. Shawn already mentioned many good reasons for why translating the
> "engineering English" to "end user English" (whatever that is) is a good
> thing.
I should have mentioned that these libraries are using Qt 4, and it would be
non-trivial to change them to Qt 5 just for compilation purposes.
I wasn't aware that doubles weren't supported on GLES. Based on that, and
rereading the forum post here
(http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?t
I'm not sure I understand. English does not have paucal (but polish have :), so
you would only need singular and plural for such an API. If this is the case,
it would be limited to languages that have the same plural rules as English.
We could do that, but I don't see the problem in providing th
Kobus Jaroslaw schreef op 3-9-2014 08:25:
>> Actually, some of the i18n features of Qt _requires_ you to provide an
>> English translation.
>> This is the case for the plural forms, where the engineer typically writes.
>> tr("Found %n item(s)", 0, m_numberOfItemsFound);
>> And Qt will pick the sin
15 matches
Mail list logo
