On Friday 29 August 2014 13:51:07 Joseph Crowell wrote:
> Is it possible to know that a folder is a Dropbox Synced folder? I don't
> think it is.
Not right now. But who knows, in the future we may be able to and so this
hybrid type might be useful.
> How about enum StorageType and function Stor
On 8/29/2014 2:34 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 14:18:06 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>>> I want an API that makes it clear that detection may fail or be
>>> ambiguous.
>>> Call it "storage locality" or "storage remoteness" or, hopefully, some
>>> better name.
>>>
>>> The more
>
> You'll see that QtCore, QtGui, QtWidgets and QtNetwork are all in the same
> repository. They were not modularised from each other.
>
> Those four basic libraries are required, period. We may provide no-xxx options
> for those rare scenarios where you may want them, but please don't complain if
On Thursday 28 August 2014 17:15:47 Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> > -no-gui and -no-widgets are not really supported. We keep them working,
> > but
> > please don't report issues if stuff breaks. We'll accept patches though.
>
> But isn't that the whole point modularizing in Qt5? One should be able
> to
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 17:02:33 Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
>> $ ../qt5/qtbase/configure -opensource -confirm-license
>> -developer-build -release -no-gui -no-widgets -no-cups -no-dbus
>> -no-xcb
>
> -no-gui and -no-widgets are not really sup
On Thursday 28 August 2014 17:02:33 Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> $ ../qt5/qtbase/configure -opensource -confirm-license
> -developer-build -release -no-gui -no-widgets -no-cups -no-dbus
> -no-xcb
-no-gui and -no-widgets are not really supported. We keep them working, but
please don't report issues if
On Thursday 28 August 2014 16:21:27 Donald Carr wrote:
> Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under
> loved and makes several demented assumptions which go largely
> unaddressed.
"under loved" is an understatement.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
So
All,
I'm getting a build failure when the "hellowindow" example is being compiled.
Configure options:
$ ../qt5/qtbase/configure -opensource -confirm-license
-developer-build -release -no-gui -no-widgets -no-cups -no-dbus
-no-xcb
Build output:
...
cd hellowindow/ && ( test -e Makefile ||
/home/ms
Yes, I feel the lack of love too! :)
I'll open a bug to track it (and possibly fix it if I get time).
-mandeep
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Donald Carr wrote:
> Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under
> loved and makes several demented assumptions which go large
Probably just an oversight; the configure script is supremely under
loved and makes several demented assumptions which go largely
unaddressed.
Ideally everyone would scratch their own itch apropos the configure
script, so if you remove this assumption and upstream it, maybe one
day it will be a li
All,
I'm building the latest from dev branch using the following options
(on 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04):
-opensource -confirm-license -developer-build -release -no-gui
-no-widgets -no-cups -no-dbus -no-xcb
However the build fails with the following message:
The test for linking against libxcb and sup
On 28 August 2014 18:34, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 14:18:06 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>> > I want an API that makes it clear that detection may fail or be
>> > ambiguous.
>> > Call it "storage locality" or "storage remoteness" or, hopefully, some
>> > better name.
>> >
>> >
On Thursday 28 August 2014 14:18:06 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> > I want an API that makes it clear that detection may fail or be
> > ambiguous.
> > Call it "storage locality" or "storage remoteness" or, hopefully, some
> > better name.
> >
> > The more types we start to add, the more difficult it be
In good old tradition I will lock down the 5.3 branches tomorrow morning.
Patches that should be in 5.3.2 can be re-targeted of course.
The lock down is needed to create the branches without races and random
commits in the middle. We will try to move to the discussed improved scheme
(without loc
On 28 Aug 2014, at 4:03 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 06:57:30 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>> But isLocal is the wrong name for something that isn't a bool, and also
>> implies that local drives are normal or preferred (which is a matter of
>> current fashion, while the future
On Thursday 28 August 2014 06:57:30 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> But isLocal is the wrong name for something that isn't a bool, and also
> implies that local drives are normal or preferred (which is a matter of
> current fashion, while the future is debatable). If we want an enum, maybe
> we'd better g
On Thursday 28. August 2014 10.31.58 Sorvig Morten wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2014, at 22:02, Milian Wolff wrote:
> >
> >
> > A synchronous API is bound to fail, see WK1 vs. WK2/WebEngine. Make it
> > asynchronous and copy the WebEngine API.
>
>
> I see now QQuickWebEngineView has:
> runJavaS
> On 27 Aug 2014, at 22:02, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
>
> A synchronous API is bound to fail, see WK1 vs. WK2/WebEngine. Make it
> asynchronous and copy the WebEngine API.
I see now QQuickWebEngineView has:
runJavaScript(const QString &script, const QJSValue &callback)
So that settles th
Hi all,
New Qt5.3.2 snapshot available:
Windows: http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.2/2014-08-28_138/
Mac: http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.2/2014-08-28_108/
Linux: http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.2/2014-08-28_131/
(Coming, available later
19 matches
Mail list logo
