Re: [Development] Qt 4.x and Qt 5 frameworks should use @rpath (QTBUG-31814)

On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:50 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >> This falls apart in the face of third party libraries. Who says a particular >> application is even using Qt with qmake? > > Nobody. But give me some real example of project using qmake but not using Qt. Everything I build in house is bui

Re: [Development] CI broken again?

On Friday 15 August 2014 11:36:14 BogDan wrote: > Hello, > > Is CI broken again? It seems it fails on the same (unrelated) places > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92216, > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92236, > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92238. > Can somebody check the

[Development] CI broken again?

Hello, Is CI broken again? It seems it fails on the same (unrelated) places  https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92216, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92236, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92238.  Can somebody check the CI? Cheers, BogDan.  ___

Re: [Development] Qt5.3.2

Hi, probably no blockers, but as Qt 5.3 is all about stability I'd like to point out my personal list of show stoppers in 5.3.1: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39977 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39965 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39888 https://b