On Friday 08 August 2014 15:22:44 Jake Petroules wrote:
> In qmake, can you explain why we can't use:
> QCoreApplication::applicationFilePath() + "/../bin", etc.?
Because that might be completely different on other machines. The prefix to the
bin directory is a user choice on configuring, just as
On 2014-08-08, at 11:20 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 07 August 2014 17:11:49 Jake Petroules wrote:
Next steps:
(1) changes to macdeployqt (removing absolute rpath & rewrite)
(2) remove rewriting in installer-framework
>>>
>>> Please don't remove the rewriting of qmake
Yes, you still have the weekend. I don’t think we’ll create the 5.4 branch
before Monday.
Cheers,
Lars
On 08/08/14 17:28, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Friday 08 August 2014 19:26:25 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
>> Should i continue pushing changes to dev branch or switch to 5.4?
>
>5.4 once it exists
On Friday 08 August 2014 19:26:25 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> Should i continue pushing changes to dev branch or switch to 5.4?
5.4 once it exists, dev until then.
>
> Is there anyone who will review during weekend? :-P
I'm around.
I'm not receiving Gerrit email, but I am looking at the Dashboard
Should i continue pushing changes to dev branch or switch to 5.4?
Is there anyone who will review during weekend? :-P
Иван Комиссаров
08 авг. 2014 г., в 19:21, Thiago Macieira
написал(а):
> On Friday 08 August 2014 11:13:47 Marc Mutz wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> the above two classes are next to
On Friday 08 August 2014 11:13:47 Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> the above two classes are next to compled, but will fail the deadline by a
> few hours, max. The're both in the seventies, change-set wise, and have at
> one point or another been already accepted.
>
> https://codereview.qt-proje
On Thursday 07 August 2014 17:11:49 Jake Petroules wrote:
> >> Next steps:
> >> (1) changes to macdeployqt (removing absolute rpath & rewrite)
> >> (2) remove rewriting in installer-framework
> >
> > Please don't remove the rewriting of qmake itself.
>
> Please elaborate? qmake is an executable a
On Friday 08 August 2014 13:24:20 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> It's been ~15 working days, congrats Milian :)
>
> Alex, can you flip the jira bit?
Thanks for the support everyone!
Bye
--
Qt Developer Days 2014 - October 6 - 8 at BCC, Berlin
Milian Wolff | milian.wo...@kdab.com | Software Enginee
It's been ~15 working days, congrats Milian :)
Alex, can you flip the jira bit?
Cheers,
Frederik
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 08:08:39 PM Gladhorn Frederik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it’s my pleasure to nominate Milian Wolff as approver. He’s a great guy,
> works for KDAB and has done interesting work o
Hi Lars,
the above two classes are next to compled, but will fail the deadline by a few
hours, max. The're both in the seventies, change-set wise, and have at one
point or another been already accepted.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/73945
https://codereview.qt-project.org/82170
I think
> How does a launched application find the Qt frameworks that were installed by
> the SDK? And how do those frameworks find the plugins?
"Phase I" changes does not change workflow, so all apps built with Qt find Qt
libraries as before. Since all Qt libraries are now using @rpath id prefix they
11 matches
Mail list logo
