On 31/07/2014 20:03, Agocs Laszlo wrote:
> Yes, setViewport() will continue to work with QOpenGLWidget too.
Great! :-)
> Note that all this does not mean existing code has to migrate away from
> QGLWidget.
> It is not going to disappear. If it works, just keep using it.
Fine, however QGLWidget
Hello,
Yes, setViewport() will continue to work with QOpenGLWidget too.
Note that all this does not mean existing code has to migrate away from
QGLWidget. It is not going to disappear. If it works, just keep using it.
Best regards,
Laszlo
From: developme
Hi,
is it planned to release QtLocation with Qt 5.4 as Alex mentioned in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/16238 ?
There is nothing about in the "feature list" on
http://qt-project.org/wiki/New-Features-in-Qt-5.4
What is the state of development?
Best regards
Martin Kröll
Greetings all,
I've just read the new features for the upcoming Qt 5.4, here:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/New-Features-in-Qt-5.4
...and I noticed this:
"Deprecated features: Qt Gui: The QtOpenGL module, that is, the QGL classes
are deprecated since QGLWidget has a suitable replacement now."
Wi
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:58:58AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em seg 30 jun 2014, às 11:10:28, Jędrzej Nowacki escreveu:
> > What about creating an intermodule api, which would stay private from a
> > user point of view. We can agree on some rules, like for example not
> > removing symbols be
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2014 11:08:59 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > Otherwise, you can also use the KArchive module part of KDE Frameworks
> > http://api.kde.org/frameworks-api/frameworks5-apidocs/karchive/html/index.html
>
> The existence
I’m all for removing the code. The XI2 implementation for the N9 is non
standard, and neither the N900 nor the N9 will see any updates in the
future (unfortunately).
Cheers,
Lars
On 30/07/14 00:07, "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" wrote:
>Hi everybody
>
>While working on XInput2 I have been worried abou
On 31/07/14 02:13, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Wednesday 30 July 2014 20:14:58 Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> > Those changes are technically source-incompatible: if you take the
>>address
>> > of one of those functions, your code will stop compiling. This was
>>found
>> > in
>> > Creator:
>> > https
