Hi Oswald
thank you for the response. You were right: It seems that the known bug
for the -qtlibinfix option
has corrupted my directory when trying it for the first time. Running
"./configure -qtamespace"
for a second time combined with a "make clean" is not sufficient to
repair it.
Building f
just a small reminder that 'stable' is dead in all released qt repos and
you are supposed to push fixes to 5.3.
in fact, at this point i'd like to delete the branch. that means that
all pending changes should be reviewed, and the approved ones actually
staged (hand-hold your drive-by contributors a
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:04:54AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:46:07 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
> >
> > It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> > something happens (or fails) over
On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:46:07 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
>
> It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> something happens (or fails) over polling a web interface too.
Could this change also be the reason why the
On 8-7-2014 11:31, Ulf Hermann wrote:
>> the question is why you find it workflow-defining. why do you in
>> your role as a _reviewer_ need to track integration progress? the
>> process is supposed to be contributor-driven.
>
> Sometimes you're waiting for someone's change to go in because you have
We are happy to announce the Qt Creator 3.2 beta:
Blog: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/07/08/qt-creator-3-2-beta-released
Opensource download:
https://download.qt-project.org/development_releases/qtcreator/3.2/3.2.0-beta1/
Enterprise download: https://login.qt.digia.com/
--
Eike Ziller, Se
> the question is why you find it workflow-defining. why do you in
> your role as a _reviewer_ need to track integration progress? the
> process is supposed to be contributor-driven.
Sometimes you're waiting for someone's change to go in because you have another
one that depends on it. Then the P
Oswald Buddenhagen [oswald.buddenha...@digia.com]
> > > [...]
> > > Is it just me or how much does everybody else rely on it?
> >
> > It's not just you. I pretty much prefer mails in my inbox in case
> > something happens (or fails) over polling a web interface too.
> >
> > I am also mildly surpri
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Hauke Krüger wrote:
> I have problems compiling Qt-5.3.1 from the sources in Mac OS X 10.9.4
> when specifying the option -qtnamespace and -qtlibinfix.
>
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35604
> 1) Option with unspecified namespace: Running
On 08-Jul-14 07:12, Hauke Krüger wrote:
> 2) Option with specified Option -qtnamespace
> -> In the terminal, running "./configure -qtnamespace rtproc" -> "make"
> in the directory qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.3.1/qtbase does not work:
> During the compilation of e.g. src/network, I see the follo
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:46:07AM +, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Blasche Alexander wrote:
> > Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > >i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
> > >the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
> > >on the downside, you now
On 08/07/2014 08:46, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Blasche Alexander wrote:
>> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
>>> the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
>>> on the downside, you now need to pay more attenti
>> i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
>> the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
>> on the downside, you now need to pay more attention in case you adopt a
>> change from someone else, as you are still a reviewer as far as gerrit
>> i
Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >i tried to reduce the flood somewhat by denying the bots (including CI)
> >the right to mail reviewers, so only the owner now gets the emails.
> >on the downside, you now need to pay more attention in case you adopt a
> >change from someone el
14 matches
Mail list logo
