> > It's certainly possible, but I'm not sure whether it's really worth
> > it, given that we still have offline installers.
>
> Is it possible to use the offline installer to install 5.3.0 into the existing
> installation and not install a new Qt Creator?
>
[> ]
No. Installer does not check for
Overall this is very good, but there are a couple of things that could be
improved:
- Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to cause
conflict. I'd suggest either removing this section or explaining a
On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:35:30 Koehne Kai wrote:
> Right, the files are still there. But to allow parallel installation (which
> is probably what you want if you e.g. are after regression testing) we'd
> need to repackage the old Qt 5.3.0 binaries , giving it a new installation
> path, changing
On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff wrote:
> I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install and
> public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do you
> think?
We have too many private headers already. We should work on getting rid
of them, not to create n
Hi Olivier,
it took some time to recompile everything but it now works!
Thank you very much for this valuable hint.
Best regards
Hauke
Am 02.07.2014 18:24, schrieb Olivier Goffart:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2014 18:00:29 Hauke Krüger wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have created a mexFunction that a
Hi,
as a result of internal discussions at Digia, I have updated
http://qt-project.org/wiki/ReportingBugsInQt a bit. The motivation
behind this is that we want the bug reports as good as possible since
many roles in the Qt project deal with them (developers, code reviewers,
release managers, p
Hello,
in my work on QtWebChannel I am hitting a problem. For proper integration into
QtWebKit/QtWebEngine, I need access to the QML API of QWebChannel. I could of
course simply add that to the public interface of the C++ QWebChannel library,
but that sounds ugly and afaik one does not do that.
On Thursday 03 July 2014 15:01:25 Lutz Schönemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd love to see that it's possible for the user to set the listen
> address for the websockets (as well as the listening port) when creating
> a new QWebSocketTransport object.
> We at basysKom already had the requirement that we n
Hi,
I'd love to see that it's possible for the user to set the listen
address for the websockets (as well as the listening port) when creating
a new QWebSocketTransport object.
We at basysKom already had the requirement that we needed to publish an
interface to different clients running differe
Hi,
2014-06-27 15:55 GMT+03:00 Zeno Albisser :
> Hi,
>
> We are currently developing Qt WebEngine as a qt-labs project.
> Now we would like Qt WebEngine to become an official Qt add-on module.
>
> I am therefore requesting to move the repository from: qt-labs/qtwebengine
> to qt/qtwebengine.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:48:46 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A user has discovered that the online installer only gives a "Qt 5.3"
> > option [1], which doesn't let us install Qt 5.3.0 instead
Hi,
We have now released Qt Enterprise Embedded on top of Qt 5.3.1 and Virtual
Keyboard 1.1.
More details can be found from blog posts:
Qt Enterprise Embedded:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/07/03/introducing-android-injection-with-qt-enterprise-embedded-5-3-1/
Virtual Keyboard:
http://blog.
Hey there,
We are currently making the QStateMachine QML-ready by amending all the QSM-
related classes (derived from QAbstractState, QAbstractTransition) and adding
Q_PROPERTYs macro where needed. You can see a list of already merged changes
here [1].
All of this work in qtbase is supposed to
13 matches
Mail list logo
