Re: [Development] Qt 5.4 new features

2014-06-25 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, Kindly reminder: Only one and half month to 5.4 feature freeze! 'Dev' branch will be locked 8th August 2014 12:00 CET and all new features for Qt5.4 needs to be in at that time! Criteria for new features/modules (from Lars's old email): Please make sure that all new functionality - Com

Re: [Development] "Use system proxies" compile option meaning

2014-06-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Wednesday 25 June 2014 18:38:15 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 19:21:02, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escreveu: > > I'm reviewing the compile options I'm using while packaging Qt and I have > > found this particular one, -system-proxies, which I don't clearly > > underst

Re: [Development] "Use system proxies" compile option meaning

2014-06-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 19:21:02, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escreveu: > I'm reviewing the compile options I'm using while packaging Qt and I have > found this particular one, -system-proxies, which I don't clearly > understand: > > - Is it used to respect system proxies in the final resul

[Development] "Use system proxies" compile option meaning

2014-06-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
I'm reviewing the compile options I'm using while packaging Qt and I have found this particular one, -system-proxies, which I don't clearly understand: - Is it used to respect system proxies in the final result? - Is it used to respect system proxies when testing QtNetwork? - A mix of both? By t

Re: [Development] QMainWindow doesn't have a titlebar when using DirectFB plugin on top of framebuffer.

2014-06-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 17:38:54, haithem rahmani escreveu: > Hello, > > I'm running Qt-5.1.1 using DirectFB plugin that runs on top of famebuffer. > Unlike Qt4 all examples are running without titlebar thus the main window > can't neither be moved, nor resized nor closed. > > is this related to

[Development] QMainWindow doesn't have a titlebar when using DirectFB plugin on top of framebuffer.

2014-06-25 Thread haithem rahmani
Hello, I'm running Qt-5.1.1 using DirectFB plugin that runs on top of famebuffer. Unlike Qt4 all examples are running without titlebar thus the main window can't neither be moved, nor resized nor closed. is this related to something missing in the DirectFB plugin or to the QPA architecture? reg

Re: [Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number

2014-06-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 17:57:35, Stephen Kelly escreveu: > On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 08:04:31 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 15:42:36, Stephen Kelly escreveu: > > > This is of course the same situation that could arise if linking a > > > program > > > with both Qt4Core and Qt5C

Re: [Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number

2014-06-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 08:04:31 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 15:42:36, Stephen Kelly escreveu: > > This is of course the same situation that could arise if linking a program > > with both Qt4Core and Qt5Core or anything. The problem is that we have > > this > > problem withi

Re: [Development] QtQuick QtCS Sessions

2014-06-25 Thread Hausmann Simon
The done is referring to the fact that a binding to qsTr("...") does not result in the creation of a Javascript binding but is treated directly by the engine as translation. just like the jira report indicates, support for dynamic re-evaluation of such bindings is not implemented yet (and was ne

Re: [Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number

2014-06-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qua 25 jun 2014, às 15:42:36, Stephen Kelly escreveu: > This is of course the same situation that could arise if linking a program > with both Qt4Core and Qt5Core or anything. The problem is that we have this > problem within the lifetime of Qt 5. > > Conclusion 1) Even if a Qt module has a dis

Re: [Development] QtQuick QtCS Sessions

2014-06-25 Thread Thomas Senyk
On Friday, 13 June, 2014 23:07:08 Alan Alpert wrote: > Here are the results and brief summaries of the 3 QtQuick related > sessions, where we came up with some suggested new properties and > types for QtQuick. > > Touch and Gestures: > http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/

[Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number

2014-06-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hello, At QtCS I briefly discussed with Lars my proposal to make a 'fixed' release of qtenginio: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/17144/focus=17272 He did not accept it because situations could arise where a downstream accidentally loads both libraries (eg through 3rd party tr

Re: [Development] Enginio build artifacts and naming conventions

2014-06-25 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Monday, May 26, 2014 20:54:51 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Hello, > > This tweet was brought to my attention: > > https://twitter.com/Korchkidu/status/470850176366968832 Hello, I discussed with Ossi a way to prevent this in the future. The create_cmake.prf file now searches for cmake unit tests

[Development] WebKit in QtQuick

2014-06-25 Thread Wolfgang Baron
Hi all, I am adding QtQuick capabilities to my Software, which currently uses QGraphicsWebView for tight browser integration, automating, what the view does and reading content from the view in order to decide, what to do and extract relevant information for other purposes. Qt 5.3.0 offers m

[Development] Qt 5.3.1 & Qt Creator 3.1.2 released

2014-06-25 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, We are happy to announce that Qt 5.3.1 & Qt Creator 3.1.2 is released today, see http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/06/25/qt-5-3-1-released/ Big thanks to everyone who has helped to make the releases happen! Br, Jani -- Ja