On Saturday 14 June 2014 20:13:17 Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip]
> As for sync'ing up with distros, we will probably have a problem because no
> schedule will line up. And, in any case, with a support plan of 18-24
> months, it's way too short for Debian.
Yes, it would mean a short overlap, but on
Em sáb 14 jun 2014, às 23:17:33, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escreveu:
> On Saturday 14 June 2014 17:55:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > * First LTS release should be either 5.3 or 5.4
> > ** Digia wants to do a business check first and will let us know
> > ** 5.3 is a good candida
On Saturday 14 June 2014 17:55:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip]
> * First LTS release should be either 5.3 or 5.4
> ** Digia wants to do a business check first and will let us know
> ** 5.3 is a good candidate because we focused on stability
Well, with my "Qt's Debian maintainer" hat, 5.3 would in
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Haataja Ismo wrote:
> Yes, we are having some performance issues but are working with that. Right
> now everything works smoothly again. We’ll keep following the situation.
Hi there,
I had a change integrated and merged nearly 12 hours ago
(https://codereview.qt-
We had a session on expiring bug reports again.
Here are my notes:
* Bug database is cluttered with old stuff
* Only triagers and devs can re-open bugs
** Normal people can only clone bugs
* Process:
** For *Unassigned* bugs that are 1 year old or more, post a nice comment
saying we're sorry w
We had two sessions because we ran out of time.
The important discussion was again on ICU. We decided to continue using the OS
API wherever possible for collation, date/time and locale support. The only OS
with lacking support is actually Windows XP: for that OS to work properly, the
user will
We had a session discussing what a more complete foundation around Qt would
be. There were plenty more discussions outside this session. The summary is
that there is will towards having a foundation, but there's a lot of work to
be done before we get there.
My notes:
* Qt Project Hosting Founda
We had an impromptu session on having a "Long term release" of Qt. There's
some interest and we can gain a few things from it. We need to investigate
before the 5.4 release.
I didn't take notes at the time, so I am summarising now:
* We've managed to make 6-month releases
** No change in schedul
Hi
I would really like to welcome the feature you present here, but I can see that
your idea has some caveats (some are sensible restrictions though), but the API
doesn't give any indication of that.
The main caveats are:
1. The implementation is limited to the first column of a layout, since
Hi,
The notes form the Qt In Scientific Researches session session are available at
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCs14QtInScientificResearches
Basically it's an overview of the round table we had. If someone has more
ideas/suggestions/information, feel free to a
Yes, we are having some performance issues but are working with that. Right now
everything works smoothly again. We’ll keep following the situation.
BR,
Ismo
From: Oleg Shparber [mailto:troll...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14. kesäkuuta 2014 3:05
To: Haataja Ismo
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re:
11 matches
Mail list logo
