[Development] FW: [Marketing] Call for Papers for Meeting C++ 2014: Deadline Sunday

2014-04-14 Thread Kojo Tero
Reposting Jens' invitation to the development list, which has more potential authors. Tero > -Original Message- > From: marketing-bounces+tero.kojo=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:marketing-bounces+tero.kojo=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf > Of Jens Weller > Sent: 14. huhtikuuta 2

Re: [Development] Custom QAnimationDriver

2014-04-14 Thread Gunnar Sletta
On 14 Apr 2014, at 08:23, Тимур Артиков wrote: > Hi Gunnar, > In my case the current time of animations should be controlled by a video > output device, and this time is not equals to real time > (QUnifiedTimer::time.elapsed()). > The QSG_FIXED_ANIMATION_STEP option is also not acceptable. I c

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em seg 14 abr 2014, às 09:59:18, Thiago Macieira escreveu: > Also, the Unix philosophy is that UTF-8 BOMs should not be used. This > started on Windows, with tools like Notepad, where changing the system > locale is not an option. To be clear: BOMs are to be used to determine that the content *is

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em seg 14 abr 2014, às 18:29:26, Olivier Goffart escreveu: > What were the reason to change that behaviour? > Personally, I think it's safer to keep the 5.2 behaviour and avoid breaking > user's code. It seemed wrong when I was rewriting that ours did like that. When I wrote tst_utf8 way back wh

Re: [Development] QWindow::setScreen() and QQuickWindow

2014-04-14 Thread Fabian Bumberger
Hi Rafael, I was looking at this today and I am also a bit puzzled about why the QWidget stays on the screen. It might have something to do with the 4 platform windows that are created for each top level QWidget. Does anyone btw. know why this is necessary? About the behaviour of "setScreen".

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Monday 14 April 2014 07:14:44 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em seg 14 abr 2014, às 15:13:53, Frank Osterfeld escreveu: > > On 14 Apr 2014, at 14:26, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > > Since this affects not just one place but many (and for example we have > > > many copies of the QML lexer around), I'd lik

Re: [Development] QtQuickComponents ComboBox with QEglFSWindow

2014-04-14 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Rutledge Shawn wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2014, at 10:15 PM, Matt Broadstone wrote: > > > Hi, > > We're experiencing an odd crash while running our Qt Quick application > in a VirtualBox session using eglfs on the framebuffer. The application > works perfectly passing th

Re: [Development] Qt 4.8.6 Release Candidate 2 available

2014-04-14 Thread Calogero Mauceri
Compiling RC2 with the following configuration is failing on our Windows machine: configure -release -qt-zlib -qt-libpng -qt-libjpeg -qt-libtiff -qt-libmng -no-qt3support -platform win32-msvc2003 -no-webkit -nomake examples -nomake demos [...] qapplication_win.cpp qclipboard_win.cpp kernel\qcl

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-14 Thread Pasion Jerome
Hello, The redirects are giving the expected results, which is to redirect people to the Qt 5 latest and increase that documentation set's exposure. The Qt 5 pages are bubbling up to the top, from my testing. The real (as real as can be) solution is to start the de-emphasization of Qt 4.8 docu

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em seg 14 abr 2014, às 15:13:53, Frank Osterfeld escreveu: > On 14 Apr 2014, at 14:26, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Since this affects not just one place but many (and for example we have > > many copies of the QML lexer around), I'd like to determine what the > > _correct_ fix for this issue is, bec

Re: [Development] Qt5.3 RC is nearing...

2014-04-14 Thread Cornelius Hald
I'd suggest this one as well: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-38294 At least if it affects other Platforms as well. Currently only tested on Linux/Gnome3. Cheers, Conny On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 10:24 +, Heikkinen Jani wrote: > Hi all, > > > > According to plans Qt5.3 RC shoul

Re: [Development] No Qt 5.3 MSVC2010 ANGEL builds?

2014-04-14 Thread Cornelius Hald
Thanks for the explanation Jani, so I'll switch everything to MSVC2013 directly and hope for the best :) Cheers, Conny On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 08:50 +, Heikkinen Jani wrote: > Hi Conny, > > >>I see that Angle is now only supported on MSWV2013. Is there a technical > >>reason for this? Would I

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Frank Osterfeld
On 14 Apr 2014, at 14:26, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Since this affects not just one place but many (and for example we have many > copies of the QML lexer around), I'd like to determine what the _correct_ fix > for this issue is, because frankly speaking I don't know :). However I have > an

[Development] Qt 4.8.6 Release Candidate 2 available

2014-04-14 Thread Salovaara Akseli
Hi, Qt 4.8.6 Release Candidate 2 packages are available at http://download.qt-project.org/development_releases/qt/4.8/4.8.6-rc2/ Sha1 frozen to 343df131f7207d65932c6505769aa2fb7fc04713 "Avoid out of bounds memory reads when scaling images". Diff compared to rc1: 343df131f7207d65932c6505769aa

[Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

2014-04-14 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, We have various parsers in Qt that parse "source code" and do things with it, such as the QML parser, the CSS parser and others. We do make the assumption that their input is UTF-8 encoded and therefore have simply used QString code = QString::fromUtf8(byteArray); in some form or other

Re: [Development] Qt5.3 RC is nearing...

2014-04-14 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Yes, we have problem to build android packages. Fix is available but we need to update qt5.git to get it our packages. Integration is now ongoing, hoping we could have new packages (with android ones as well) tomorrow morning Br, Jani From: Steve Gold [mailto:steveg2...@gmail.com] Sent: 14. huh

Re: [Development] Qt5.3 RC is nearing...

2014-04-14 Thread Steve Gold
There are exe’s in the 5.3.0-RC snapshot area with qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw482_opengl-5.3.0-RC but none with qt-opensource-windows-x86-android-5.3.0-RC Is there a problem creating Android builds for Windows? Thanks. Steve From: Heikkinen Jani Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 6:24

Re: [Development] QtQuickComponents ComboBox with QEglFSWindow

2014-04-14 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 11 Apr 2014, at 10:15 PM, Matt Broadstone wrote: > Hi, > We're experiencing an odd crash while running our Qt Quick application in a > VirtualBox session using eglfs on the framebuffer. The application works > perfectly passing the '-platform eglfs' options, however, when we try to use > a

[Development] Qt5.3 RC is nearing...

2014-04-14 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, According to plans Qt5.3 RC should be out Thu 24th Apr 2014, see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.3-release . To be able to do that we need to have packages ready latest Tue 22nd April! So there isn't so many days to finalize remaining issues... If there is still something to do for RC

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-14 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, 'Stable' is now open for changes targeted to Qt5.3.1. Br, Jani From: Heikkinen Jani Sent: 10. huhtikuuta 2014 12:52 To: development@qt-project.org Cc: releas...@qt-project.org Subject: RE: HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release Importance: High Hi, All merges are now done and

Re: [Development] No Qt 5.3 MSVC2010 ANGEL builds?

2014-04-14 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi Conny, >>I see that Angle is now only supported on MSWV2013. Is there a technical >>reason for this? Would I run into trouble if I tried to compile Qt 5.3 >>with Angel using MSVC2010? >> >>Also is OpenGL now the preferred build? I was under the impression, that >>Angle is the saver bet. Has thi

Re: [Development] No Qt 5.3 MSVC2010 ANGEL builds?

2014-04-14 Thread Cornelius Hald
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 13:07 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sex 11 abr 2014, às 16:22:13, Cornelius Hald escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I've just noticed that there are no MSVC2010 ANGEL builds of Qt 5.3 in > > current snapshots. Is this because of some technical issues or will the > > support for t

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-14 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 13 Apr 2014, at 8:10 PM, André Pönitz wrote: > Shawn wrote: >> On 2 Apr 2014, at 6:07 PM, Ariel Molina wrote: >>> >>> Please whatever you do, do not break this anymore, the current >>> state is already messed up. >> >> I agree. But I think the idea was to change it one last time and then >

Re: [Development] No Qt 5.3 MSVC2010 ANGEL builds?

2014-04-14 Thread Cornelius Hald
Hi Jani, thanks for the information, so it looks like I have to update my tool chain... I see that Angle is now only supported on MSWV2013. Is there a technical reason for this? Would I run into trouble if I tried to compile Qt 5.3 with Angel using MSVC2010? Also is OpenGL now the preferred buil