Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 23:00:18, Olivier Goffart escreveu: > > Performance-wise, I'd prefer empty functions that get overridden at > > runtime. That's the smallest overhead for when they are not present. > > According to a quick benchmark (attached), it is clearly more efficient to > have: > if

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 07:42:46 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 15:49:16, Volker Krause escreveu: > > > API-wise we are quite flexible (can't get any more dirty than what we do > > > now ;) ), I was mainly asking

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 07:42:46 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 15:49:16, Volker Krause escreveu: > > API-wise we are quite flexible (can't get any more dirty than what we do > > now ;) ), I was mainly asking due to this being on a performance-relevant > > path. The QInternal call

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 15:49:16, Volker Krause escreveu: > API-wise we are quite flexible (can't get any more dirty than what we do now > ;) ), I was mainly asking due to this being on a performance-relevant path. > The QInternal callback system is obviously more flexible (and thus would be > my pr

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread Poenitz Andre
volker.kra...@kdab.com: > > > So unless there's some compiler magic I missed I think this needs a > > > different approach to be reliable and cross-platform, such as callbacks. > > > Would this be acceptable? If so, would a minimal approach similar to > > > qt_register_signal_spy_callbacks() or r

Re: [Development] Tizen emulator

2014-04-08 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2014-04-07 21:13 GMT+02:00 Victor Ruiz : > Hi, > > I am trying to follow the tutorial for building a Qt based tizen app. > > I had trouble with the step: > > cd ../emulator > ./prepare_developer_tools.sh > > Since the URLs were not found. I changed repos to: > > export > BASE_REPO=http://download.t

[Development] Tizen emulator

2014-04-08 Thread Victor Ruiz
Hi, I am trying to follow the tutorial for building a Qt based tizen app. I had trouble with the step: 1. cd ../emulator 2. ./prepare_developer_tools.sh Since the URLs were not found. I changed repos to: export BASE_REPO=http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/2.2-emul/common/ *latest*/repos

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-08 Thread Volker Krause
On Monday 07 April 2014 10:18:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em seg 07 abr 2014, às 17:48:46, Volker Krause escreveu: > > The current situation is that the hooks work fine on Linux/QNX in > > combination with LD_PRELOAD (unless you have a non-recent gold that > > ignores > > QtCore.dynlist). They als

Re: [Development] Qt-iOS: Popover-Like Styled Frames

2014-04-08 Thread Robert Iakobashvili
Dear Richard, Thank you very much for the direction of using nativeResourceForWindow that looks promising. "Nativity" issue seems be even more sensitive for iOS than for Android; it could actually be a ground for not accepting apps to the only store. Is there any place to vote for these iOS-nati

Re: [Development] Qt-iOS: Popover-Like Styled Frames

2014-04-08 Thread Gustavsen Richard
Hi! Native menus are on the todo list, but currently not implemented on iOS. You can take a look at this example (https://github.com/richardmg/qtdd13_qmlapp) to get an idea on how you can make use of native view controllers (like a UIPopoverController ) in your app. -Richard ___