Re: [Development] [Interest] Executing PowerShell command with quotes using QProcess

2014-04-02 Thread Damian Ivanov
I'm sorry if this may not help but I wanted to share as it's somewhat related. On Windows systems one can from QProccess access any Windows cmd command. The process should be defined as "cmd /c $mycommand" /k maybe also useful. 2014-04-03 2:34 GMT+02:00 Sze Howe Koh : > On 3 April 2014 06:23, Thia

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-02 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 2 Apr 2014, at 6:07 PM, Ariel Molina wrote: > The current state of Qt docs is very sad, making online searches near to > useless. All Google searches refer either to broken pages, to 4.x doc pages, > to incomplete 5.0 unstables or even to 3.3 documentation. What's the point on > having 5.x

Re: [Development] [Interest] Executing PowerShell command with quotes using QProcess

2014-04-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 03 abr 2014, às 08:34:20, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: > > There's a comment in qprocess.cpp that reads: > > // handle quoting. tokens can be surrounded by double quotes > > // "hello world". three consecutive double quotes represent > > // the quote character itself. > > > > I don't

Re: [Development] [Interest] Executing PowerShell command with quotes using QProcess

2014-04-02 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 3 April 2014 06:23, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em qua 02 abr 2014, às 12:18:59, Jason Kretzer escreveu: >> powershellHDD.start("PowerShell -Command \"&{(Get-WmiObject >> Win32_LogicalDisk -Filter \\\"DeviceID='C:'\\\").Size}\""); > >> This does not work as I expect it to. The dataHDDsize is

[Development] Help with WinCE: time()

2014-04-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
According to the C standard, 7.23.2.4: 7.23.2.4 The time function Synopsis #include time_t time(time_t *timer); The Linux manual says: CONFORMING TO SVr4, 4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001. However, it's not working in https://codereview.qt-project.org/81697. The CI says:

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-02 Thread Ariel Molina
The current state of Qt docs is very sad, making online searches near to useless. All Google searches refer either to broken pages, to 4.x doc pages, to incomplete 5.0 unstables or even to 3.3 documentation. What's the point on having 5.x (or any) docs if you keep moving them around hiding it from

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-02 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:55:46PM +, Pasion Jerome wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > We plan to deploy the redirects next week to avoid the Easter break; > hopefully, Monday. > > Some more notes: > A) The Qt 5.0, 5.1, and 5.2 documentation sets are already hosted in the

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-04-02 Thread Pasion Jerome
Hello all, Thanks for the feedback. We plan to deploy the redirects next week to avoid the Easter break; hopefully, Monday. Some more notes: A) The Qt 5.0, 5.1, and 5.2 documentation sets are already hosted in the archives: http://doc.qt.digia.com/archives/index.html There will be links to th

Re: [Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all!

2014-04-02 Thread Koehne Kai
I guess it's obvious by now, but still: This was an April Fools' Day joke. Kudos goes to Tuukka Turunen for having the original idea. Kai > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org