On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 03:07:13PM +0200, Christian Kandeler wrote:
> On 04/01/2014 02:00 PM, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> > "Darn! I forgot to clone qtjsondb".
>
> You usually notice that very soon due to the lack of compile errors.
Compilation should be dropped anyway. Why spend time on such a pesk
On Tuesday, 01 April, 2014 15:48:01 Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:27:09AM +0200, Thomas Senyk wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 26 February, 2014 12:51:30 BERTIN, NICOLAS wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get WebKit2 running on a Linux/i.MX6Q board (sabresd). I
> > > succeeded in bui
>
> So, here is what we will do:
> - create one branch named 'qt' out of current stable
> - block any other branches in gerrit
> - move on with this branch, and announce the current status of it (open for
> features, feature freeze, hardening...) on the mailing list
>
> In addition there seems to
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:27:09AM +0200, Thomas Senyk wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 February, 2014 12:51:30 BERTIN, NICOLAS wrote:
> > I'm trying to get WebKit2 running on a Linux/i.MX6Q board (sabresd). I
> > succeeded in building Qt5.2.1+eglfs and the WebKit1 based examples are
> > running well
On 1 Apr 2014, at 2:37 PM, André Somers wrote:
> Diego Iastrubni schreef op 1-4-2014 14:17:
>> I agree.
>>
>> As we move to a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
>> git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
>> anyway.
> I'd actually like to suggest an upg
On 04/01/2014 02:00 PM, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> "Darn! I forgot to clone qtjsondb".
You usually notice that very soon due to the lack of compile errors.
Christian
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mai
On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:12:18 Koehne Kai wrote:
> I had a discussion with this with a couple of people, including Lars. In the
> end we realized that both models are too complicated, and we should rather
> have only one branch. Reality shows that we're working pretty sequential,
> anyway: Eve
>> I agree.
>>
>> As we move to a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
>> git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
>> anyway.
> I'd actually like to suggest an upgrade to CSV then.
I'd say get rid off complicated systems etc altogether and use an ftp server
Diego Iastrubni schreef op 1-4-2014 14:17:
> I agree.
>
> As we move to a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
> git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
> anyway.
I'd actually like to suggest an upgrade to CSV then.
André
_
I agree.
As we move to a more linear development cycle, we can finally drop
git and update to svn, "where we are going we don't need branches"
anyway.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've had now different setups with git branches - in Qt 4 we followed a
> scheme w
On Tuesday 01 April 2014 11:12:18 Koehne Kai wrote:
> So, here is what we will do:
> - create one branch named 'qt' out of current stable
> - block any other branches in gerrit
> - move on with this branch, and announce the current status of it (open for
> features, feature freeze, hardening...) on
On 01-Apr-14 13:12, Koehne Kai wrote:
> If there are no fundamental objections I'd like to see this into action as
> early as possible, to not risk the 5.3.0 release (i.e. next week Thursday,
> when we originally planned to merge to release branch).
I'm all for it. We also should integrate all
+1
On 01 Apr 2014, at 12:58, Nichols Andy wrote:
> Hello fellow Qt developers,
>
> I would like to nominate Giulio Camuffo for Qt Project approver status.
> Giulio has been contributing to the QtWayland module for over a year now with
> both quality code submissions as well as code reviews.
>
+1
From: development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Jorgen
Lind [jorgen.l...@digia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 1:17 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re
+1
On Tuesday 01 April 2014 10:58:11 Nichols Andy wrote:
> Hello fellow Qt developers,
>
> I would like to nominate Giulio Camuffo for Qt Project approver status.
> Giulio has been contributing to the QtWayland module for over a year now
> with both quality code submissions as well as code review
Hi,
We've had now different setups with git branches - in Qt 4 we followed a scheme
with one master branch, which gets forked into minor version branches (e.g.
4.8), which gets forked into patch branches (e.g. 4.8.1) ... in Qt 5 we adopted
a model where we had only three branches: dev, stable,
+1
Seconded. Having followed giucam's contributions to QtWayland and discussions
on IRC, I have to agree that he would make a valuable Approver for QtWayland
and the Qt Project in general.
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+andrew.knight=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:
Hello fellow Qt developers,
I would like to nominate Giulio Camuffo for Qt Project approver status.
Giulio has been contributing to the QtWayland module for over a year now with
both quality code submissions as well as code reviews.
He is easy to get in touch with on IRC, and is responsive when a
On Wednesday, 26 February, 2014 12:51:30 BERTIN, NICOLAS wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to get WebKit2 running on a Linux/i.MX6Q board (sabresd). I
> succeeded in building Qt5.2.1+eglfs and the WebKit1 based examples are
> running well.
>
> Now, I'm trying to get WebKit2 running: the MiniBrowse
Hi
We got tired of restarting Jenkins twice a week, so I tweaked the machine a
bit. It now has 6 cores instead of 2, it has 24 gigs of memory instead of 8, I
adjusted Jenkins to use max heap size of 8gb instead of 1gb and maxpermsize was
increased to 4096 from 512.
Sorry for breaking your curr
20 matches
Mail list logo
