Completely agree with Chris, and I'm missing this functionality, too.
Does "QContactCollection" sound ok to you?
Regards,
Konstantin
2014-03-18 3:29 GMT+02:00 Chris Adams :
> Hi Renato,
>
> Is an address book a contactable entity? It seems like it's just a
> collection of contacts, rather than
Em ter 18 mar 2014, às 16:11:31, Steve Gold escreveu:
> There are currently 6 directories in
> http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.0-beta/ with a date of
> 2014-03-18, namely 2014-03-18_9 - 2014-03-18_10 and 2014-03-18_16 -
> 2014-03-18_19. What is the significance of all the direct
There are currently 6 directories in
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.0-beta/ with a date of
2014-03-18, namely 2014-03-18_9 - 2014-03-18_10 and 2014-03-18_16 -
2014-03-18_19. What is the significance of all the directories, especially
since they don’t contain the same builds
Sure, but I feel that the beta tag are not considered a "dumb-straight from
git" for Qt users. They expect some minimal quality for a build to be
considered a beta.
I often report bugs, but I'm still using alpha because this bug is a major
blocker to me. This bug is not only a inconvenience, but m
Hi,
Without taking a stand on that item as such, Jani is right in that beta is
not supposed to be used in production. There can be regressions to earlier
functionality. New functionality should work and otherwise things should
of course be in a usable level. We are making beta directly out of sta
Hi all,
Is this really so critical issue that it blocks us to release beta? I agree we
cannot release final with this one but I am wondering why this should block the
beta? Maybe I didn't fully understood the issue but for me it seems this
doesn't prevent usage but looks ugly. Beta is for API re
Apologies for the cross-post (interest@ and development@), but registration
just opened this morning for "CppCon 2014", September 7-12, 2014 in
Bellevue, Washington, USA.
http://cppcon.org/
There is a "Super-Early-Bird" registration price of $695 for the week for
the first 100 people.
It would b
Em ter 18 mar 2014, às 11:51:04, Adam Strzelecki escreveu:
> * QTBUG-31814 - Still installer hard-codes framework ID/path,
> while since 10.5 one can use @rpath which is far more portable
This one is not a showstopper. It's a suggestion to improve the way we do
installation. It's unproven, but if
Hello Development:
I am newly arrived on Qt 5.2x scene and wanted to know how to contribute
code, fixes,
and testing for Qt 5.3.x of IOS and Android.
Specifically, I want to focus on QT C++ <-> Objective C/Cocoa bridge
and QT C++ <-> Android/Java/JNI.
Is the development email list a free flowin
Em ter 18 mar 2014, às 10:20:47, Alan Ng escreveu:
> Hi, I am trying to access WebCore internal classes like the
> RenderObject but they are not exported symbols in the final
> Qt5Webkit.dll . Is there a simple/easy way to export all the symbols
> in the build process? I hope I don't need to mark e
The 5.3 beta shall not be released without fixing
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-37422 first.
It is a very critical bug, and a regression from Alpha.
Basically it renders most of QtQuick interfaces, including Qt Quick Widgets,
useless in Windows and other systems.
> Hi all,
>
> Q
Why do you want to manually provide a DFB surface to Qt?
Qt 4 and 5 can both work on top of DirectFB (Qt4 via QWS and Qt5 via
QPA plugin). Which Qt version are you using?
-mandeep
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Rupesh Sahu wrote:
> Hello Sir/Mam,
>
> I want to create a DirectFB Surface and
Hi,
> On Windows, we need to deploy several applications residing in various
> directories, and would like them all to share the same set of Qt libraries
> (weighing about 40MB). Currently we have to copy the full set into every
> app directory for them to launch correctly.
>
> The only way I coul
Hi,
> On Windows, we need to deploy several applications residing in various
> directories, and would like them all to share the same set of Qt libraries
> (weighing about 40MB). Currently we have to copy the full set into every
> app directory for them to launch correctly.
>
> The only way I coul
Yeah, that's true. But on the other hand there is still time to fix these ( &
others as well) before Qt 5.3.0 final release. We are now releasing beta which
is for API review. There will be lots of fixes after beta...
Br,
Jani
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+jani.heikki
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 10:12:35 André Bergner wrote:
> So what is the "official" way to render a QQuickView scene to an offscreen
> target while keeping it "alive"?
>
> I remember talking to somebody at the last Qt dev days in Berlin. He was
> suggesting some solution that should make this possi
Hi, I am trying to access WebCore internal classes like the
RenderObject but they are not exported symbols in the final
Qt5Webkit.dll . Is there a simple/easy way to export all the symbols
in the build process? I hope I don't need to mark every classes with
export macro. I built Qt from git using M
> well, what is more important? adding new features or fixing existing
> bugs? for one of my use case, there were quite a number of showstopper
> bugs in qt-5.2 so i'm glad that 5.3 focused more on stability than on
> features …
I wish it was like that but still I can find some outstanding bugs th
Regarding Question 1: I am basically trying to achieve the "Classic Style"
of the wizard as shown in the link
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qwizard.html#WizardOption-enum.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-proj
Hello Sir/Mam,
I want to create a DirectFB Surface and above that i have to call QT
program. Its very useful if anyone of you will give me a link for a above
problem or can send me simple example for it. I will be very thankful to
all of you.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Rupesh Kumar Sahu
Cell : 72048
Hi,
On Windows, we need to deploy several applications residing in various
directories, and would like them all to share the same set of Qt libraries
(weighing about 40MB). Currently we have to copy the full set into every app
directory for them to launch correctly.
The only way I could find wa
Hello,
I went through the Qt-IF documentation may be 3 to 4 times, went through all
the examples, did some trial and error but still not able to get hold of few
things, in fact many things. Hoping to get some answers from the experts.
Question1: I want to get rid of the Header part of the I
Hi,
I there any chance to backport object_parallel_to_source to 4.8.6 as reported
here:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34871
This is really tiny change:
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/47df12225918ba82abe35921af19e547717da58b?format=patch
Best regards,
--
Adam
_
>
> I'm also not sure if it's worth it. Perhaps using Q_PRIVATE_PROPERTY gets
> us
> close enough?
Q_PRIVATE_PROPERTY allows only pointer and can't use
ui->object->nextObject or ui_->getObject().
2014-03-12 18:36 GMT+06:00 Simon Hausmann :
> On Wednesday 12. March 2014 12.48.20 Olivier Goffar
Hi all,
for a project we use QML/QtQuick2 to render two separate offscreen views
for an application. We are currently still on Qt 5.1 and use a somehow
hacky solution to accomplish that goal, which is we create a QWindow and
set it immediately after its creation to hidden. We add two QQuickViews a
but 5.3 hasn't compass (for ios and android) and not webkit for
>>> android?
N.
>>>
>>> ... and no Qt3D!?
>>>
>>
>>
>> And still no skynet like AI that predict the future?
>>
> These questions about the features may seem silly to some, but some of
> them are critical for
Hi,
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > but 5.3 hasn't compass (for ios and android) and not webkit for
>> android?
>> >
>> > N.
>>
>> ... and no Qt3D!?
>>
>
>
> And still no skynet like AI that predict the future?
>
These questions about the features may seem silly to some, but some of
them are criti
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 09:30:17 Helmut Mülner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > but 5.3 hasn't compass (for ios and android) and not webkit for android?
> >
> > N.
>
> ... and no Qt3D!?
>
And still no skynet like AI that predict the future?
--
Olivier
Woboq - Qt services and support
> Hi,
> but 5.3 hasn't compass (for ios and android) and not webkit for android?
> N.
... and no Qt3D!?
Helmut
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi,
but 5.3 hasn't compass (for ios and android) and not webkit for android?
N.
> Hi all,
>
> Qt 5.3 beta release is planned to happen this Thursday. At the moment we
> don't have final beta packages available for your testing :( Most probably
> those will be available tomorrow morning.
Hi all,
Qt 5.3 beta release is planned to happen this Thursday. At the moment we don't
have final beta packages available for your testing :( Most probably those will
be available tomorrow morning.
But to be ready for Beta please remember to update all new Qt5.3 features in
wiki: http://qt-pro
31 matches
Mail list logo
